Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39247652›Full record

ReviewBiomaterials research2024

Decellularized Extracellular Matrix Scaffolds for Soft Tissue Augmentation: From Host-Scaffold Interactions to Bottlenecks in Clinical Translation.

Yasamin Ostadi, Javad Khanali, Fatemeh A Tehrani, Ghasem Yazdanpanah, Soheyl Bahrami, Feizollah Niazi, Hassan Niknejad

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomaterials research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Human Adipose Allograft Restores Volume Through Host-mediated Tissue Replacement.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yasamin OstadiDepartment of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8652-7297
Javad KhanaliDepartment of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9853-454X
Fatemeh A TehraniDepartment of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-3636-8831
Ghasem YazdanpanahDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Illinois Eye and Ear Infirmary, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7518-8701
Soheyl BahramiLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Experimental and Clinical Traumatology in AUVA Research Center, Vienna, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4563-6251
Feizollah NiaziDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4825-0263
Hassan NiknejadDepartment of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Along with a paradigm shift in looking at soft tissue fillers from space-filling to bioactive materials, decellularized extracellular matrix (DEM) fillers have gained more attention considering their superior bioactivity. However, the complex mechanisms that govern the interaction between host tissues and DEMs have been partially understood. This review first covers the mechanisms that determine immunogenicity, angiogenesis and vasculogenesis, and recellularization and remodeling after DEM implantation into host tissue, with a particular focus on related findings from filler materials. Accordingly, the review delves into the dual role of macrophages and their M1/M2 polarization paradigm to form both constructive and destructive immune responses to DEM implants. Moreover, the contribution of macrophages in angiogenesis has been elucidated, which includes but is not limited to the secretion of angiogenic growth factors and extracellular matrix (ECM) remodeling. The findings challenge the traditional view of immune cells as solely destructive entities in biomaterials and indicate their multifaceted roles in tissue regeneration. Furthermore, the review discusses how the compositional factors of DEMs, such as the presence of growth factors and matrikines, can influence angiogenesis, cell fate, and differentiation during the recellularization process. It is also shown that the biomechanical properties of DEMs, including tissue stiffness, modulate cell responses through mechanotransduction pathways, and the structural properties of DEMs, such as scaffold porosity, impact cell-cell and cell-ECM interactions. Finally, we pointed out the current clinical applications, the bottlenecks in the clinical translation of DEM biomaterials into soft tissue fillers, as well as the naïve research areas of the field.

Identifiers

PMID39247652
PMCPMC11378302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.