Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39247632›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2024

Protocol for a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis of optimizing oxygen therapy in critically ill patients.

Xiaobo Yang, Yaqi Ouyang, Jiqian Xu, You Shang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xiaobo YangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Yaqi OuyangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Jiqian XuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
You ShangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Oxygen therapy is a cornerstone treatment of critically ill patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). Whether lower oxygenation therapy brings superior survival outcomes to higher oxygenation therapy is unknown. Methods: We will search electronic databases: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP), and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to 1 January 2024. Two authors will independently screen for all eligible clinical studies. Emails will be sent for individual participant data. The statistical analyses will be conducted using STATA 15.0 software. Results: We will evaluate the efficacy of lower oxygenation therapy compared with higher oxygenation therapy based on individual participant data. Conclusion: This study will offer clinical evidence for oxygen therapy in ICU patients.

Indexed as

individual participant dataintensive care unitmeta-analysisoxygen therapyprotocolsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID39247632
PMCPMC11377226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.