ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2024
Comparative Three-dimensional Analysis of Facial Lifting Effects across Five Aesthetic Units following Continuous Radiation 115-Watt 6.78-MHz Monopolar Radiofrequency Therapy.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Innovative Facial Contouring Using a Monopolar Radiofrequency Device with Continuous Water Cooling: An Integrated Clinical and Preclinical Study.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Trial
- Objective and subjective retrospective evaluation of XERF, a novel single-shot dual-frequency non-invasive monopolar radiofrequency.Lasers in medical science · 2026Article
- Adipogenesis and Stem Cell Activation in Facial Fat After Repeated Low-energy Continuous Monopolar Radiofrequency: Ultrasound, 3D Imaging, and Histological Study.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Modern aesthetic trends favor noninvasive facelift procedures, shifting away from traditional surgery. This study explores the three-dimensional evaluation of facial lifting across aesthetic units using the VolNewMer (VNM) device after continuous 115-W 6.78-MHz monopolar radiofrequency (RF) therapy. Methods: A cohort of 30 Korean women underwent VNM treatment with a detailed protocol, including energy levels, cooling techniques, and stem cell media application. Lifting amount was analyzed using a three-dimensional scanner with computer program in five specific areas, including the forehead, lateral orbital rim, mid-face, low-face, and neck areas. The changes in Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale for skin texture, tightening, and lifting were surveyed. Results: Immediate and sustained improvement was observed in the mid-cheeks and lower face area. The lifting amount of facial mid-cheek areas was 1.88 ± 0.76 mm, whereas the lifting amount of lower face areas was 1.79 ± 0.91, lateral orbital rim areas was 1.62 ± 0.99, forehead areas was 1.46 ± 1.26, and neck areas was 2.66 ± 1.40 mm immediately after the procedure. The lifting amount of mid-cheek areas was 1.93 ± 0.90 mm, whereas lower face areas was 1.67 ± 1.04, lateral orbital rim areas was 1.58 ± .072, forehead areas was 1.31 ± 0.73, and neck areas was 2.80 ± 0.78 mm 1 month after the procedure. Conclusions: RF treatment is emerging as a recommended noninvasive procedure for facial lifting. VNM-RF treatment showed a significant lifting effect immediately after the procedure, and the lifting effect continued 1 month later (
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.