ArticleGenetics research2024
Identification and Validation of Cytotoxicity-Related Features to Predict Prognostic and Immunotherapy Response in Patients with Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Article in Genetics research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring and Validating Prognostic Biomarkers Related to Sphingolipid Metabolism in Gastric Cancer through Machine LearningEndocrine, metabolic & immune disorders drug targets · 2026Article
- Identification of Molecular Subtypes of Clear-Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma in Patient-Derived Xenografts Using Multi-Omics.Cancers · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is a renal cortical malignancy with a complex pathogenesis. Identifying ideal biomarkers to establish more accurate promising prognostic models is crucial for the survival of kidney cancer patients. Methods: Seurat R package was used for single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) data filtering, dimensionality reduction, clustering, and differentially expressed genes analysis. Gene coexpression network analysis (WGCNA) was performed to identify the cytotoxicity-related module. The independent cytotoxicity-related risk model was established by the survival R package, and Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival analysis and timeROC with area under the curve (AUC) were employed to confirm the prognosis and effectiveness of the risk model. The risk and prognosis in patients suffering from ccRCC were predicted by establishing a nomogram. A comparison of the level of immune infiltration in different risk groups and subtypes using the CIBERSORT, MCP-counter, and TIMER methods, as well as assessment of drug sensitivity to conventional chemotherapeutic agents in risk groups using the pRRophetic package, was made. Results: Eleven ccRCC subpopulations were identified by single-cell sequencing data from the GSE224630 dataset. The identified cytotoxicity-related T-cell cluster and module genes defined three cytotoxicity-related molecular subtypes. Six key genes (SOWAHB, SLC16A12, IL20RB, SLC12A8, PLG, and HHLA2) affecting prognosis risk genes were selected for developing a risk model. A nomogram containing the RiskScore and stage revealed that the RiskScore contributed the most and exhibited excellent predicted performance for prognosis in the calibration plots and decision curve analysis (DCA). Notably, high-risk patients with ccRCC demonstrate a poorer prognosis with higher immune infiltration characteristics and TIDE scores, whereas low-risk patients are more likely to benefit from immunotherapy. Conclusions: A ccRCC survival prognostic model was produced based on the cytotoxicity-related signature, which had important clinical significance and may provide guidance for ccRCC treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.