Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39247489›Full record

ArticleGynecologic oncology reports2024

Treatment outcomes of vulvar and vaginal melanoma at an NCCN institution between 1993 and 2021.

Stuart A Ostby, Saige Daniel, Eleftheria Kalogera, Luigi De Vitis, Angela J Fought, Michaela E McGree, Carrie L Langstraat, Matthew S Block

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gynecologic oncology reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Stuart A OstbyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Saige DanielDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Eleftheria KalogeraDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Luigi De VitisDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Angela J FoughtDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, Division of Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Michaela E McGreeDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, Division of Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Carrie L LangstraatDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Matthew S BlockDepartment of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN, USA.

Funding

Women's Cancer ProgramP30CA015083 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI AKHILESH PANDEY · 1985 to 2026
$151.3M
Use of microfluidic tumor cultures to enable clinical trials of therapies for ovarian cancerP50CA136393 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI ELLEN L. GOODE · 2009 to 2026
$37.0M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA015083NCI NIH HHS P50 CA136393
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Vulvar melanoma and vaginal melanoma are rare and difficult to treat. We describe the last three decades in a cohort predominantly treated surgically with adjuvant therapy. Methods: All new patients between 1993 and 2021 followed until 2024. Collection of demographic and oncologic data allowed comparisons and Kaplan-Meier method was used to evaluate overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) stratified by adjuvant therapy type, diagnosis before and after 2011, and between vulvar and vaginal melanomas. Results: Consultation for 63/72 patients (87.5 %) were for primary treatment. Most patients had vulvar melanoma (50/72, 69.4 %), received surgery (65/72, 90.3 %), and adjuvant treatment (40/72, 55.6 %) with immunotherapy, chemotherapy, and/or targeted therapy. Median survival for 63 patients presenting for primary treatment was 54.2 months, and 9/13 patients who were disease free after five years later received adjuvant immunotherapy. Survival did not vary by adjuvant therapy type or diagnosis after 2011 but was significantly less for vaginal melanoma. Following recurrence seven patients experienced complete response including three patients receiving combined nivolumab with ipilimumab and two nivolumab alone experienced. Conclusions: Survival was not significantly different by adjuvant therapy type or after 2011. Most patients who were disease-free five years after surgery had received adjuvant therapy. Seven patients experienced complete responses to therapy after recurrence of whom five received immune checkpoint inhibitors. Although survival is not improved as in cutaneous melanomas by immune checkpoint inhibitors, signal continues for the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in gynecologic melanomas.

Indexed as

Immune checkpoint inhibitorsTargeted therapyVaginal melanomaVulvar melanoma

Identifiers

PMID39247489
PMCPMC11379566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.