ArticleHeliyon2024
A study of a loss system with priorities.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Capacity Planning for Small Hospitals and Departments Illustrated Using Maternity and Paediatrics Departments: Roles for Weighted Population Density, Seasonality and Size, Myths Around Length of Stay and Factors Influencing Costs and Funding.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Erlang loss formula, also known as the Erlang B formula, has been known for over a century and has been used in a wide range of applications, from telephony to hospital intensive care unit management. It provides the blocking probability of arriving customers to a loss system involving a finite number of servers without a waiting room. Because of the need to introduce priorities in many services, an extension of the Erlang B formula to the case of a loss system with preemptive priority is valuable and essential. This paper analytically establishes the consistency between the global balance (steady state) equations for a loss system with preemptive priorities and a known result obtained using traffic loss arguments for the same problem. This paper, for the first time, derives this known result directly from the global balance equations based on the relevant multidimensional Markov chain. The paper also addresses the question of whether or not the well-known insensitivity property of the Erlang loss system is also applicable to the case of a loss system with preemptive priorities, provides explanations, and demonstrates through simulations that, except for the blocking probability of the highest priority customers, the blocking probabilities of the other customers are sensitive to the service time distributions and that a larger service time variance leads to a lower blocking probability of the lower priority traffic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.