ArticleHeliyon2024
A prospective single arm cohort study: An analysis of the effectiveness of surgical treatment of locally advanced breast cancer.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Breast cancer stands as a globally significant contributor to both incidence rates and mortality among women. Approximately 10-15 % of women will face a diagnosis of an advanced yet potentially treatable stage of the disease. When individuals diagnosed with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) exhibit resistance to preoperative chemotherapy and experience tumor progression, they unfortunately forfeit the opportunity for surgical intervention, thereby diminishing the prospects for a radical cure. Method: We conducted a prospective, single-arm cohort study aimed at evaluating the feasibility of locally modified radical resection for LABC with skin invasion. The primary endpoints encompassed overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS), whereas the secondary endpoint focused on the quality of life (QoL) among breast cancer patients. Results: Between March 2018 and December 2022, a total of 38 eligible patients were enrolled in this study. The Kaplan-Meier estimates for 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year DFS among all patients were 69.8 %, 53.3 %, and 37.5 %, respectively. Correspondingly, the OS rates were 100.0 %, 85.6 %, and 68.0 %. Both univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that patients with a history of neoadjuvant chemotherapy who exhibited stable or progressive disease had inferior DFS outcomes. Notably, patients demonstrated clinically meaningful and statistically significant enhancements in functional status and overall QoL. However, no notable improvement was observed in specific symptom domains. Conclusion: Patients with locally advanced breast cancer, specifically those presenting with T4 tumors, who undergo surgical intervention followed by postoperative adjuvant therapy, can attain favorable prognostic outcomes and experience an enhanced quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.