ReviewHeliyon2024
Prospective applications of bioactive materials in orthopedic therapies: A review.
Review in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Synergistic Effects of Calcium Phosphate Biomaterials Combined with Honey on Osteochondral Regeneration: A Qualitative Study in an Animal Model.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Toward next-generation hip implants: From failure mechanisms to translational design.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2026Review
- Smart biomaterials for cardiovascular, bone, and skin tissue engineering: mechanisms, applications, and future prospects.Journal of biological engineering · 2026Review
- Surface modifications of titanium dental implants: optimizing antibacterial activity and osteoimmunomodulation.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Advances in functional nanomaterials and piezoelectric biomaterials for personalized intramedullary fixation: addressing age-related orthopedic challenges.Frontiers in chemistry · 2026Review
- Mammalian, plant, and gut microbiota-derived extracellular vesicles as emerging therapeutics for bone diseases.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Long-term Performance and Durability of Biomaterials and Implant Designs in Total Joint Arthroplasty and Spinal Fusion.Journal of orthopaedics and sports medicine · 2026Article
- Multiscale Design of Dental Restorative Materials: Mechanistic Foundations, Technological Innovations, and Clinical Translation.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- Optimisation of 3D Printing Parameters and Surface Modification for Porous Gyroid Structures in Beta Titanium Alloy Ti25Nb4Ta8Sn.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Article
- Next-generation microneedle platforms for site-specific management of diabetic neuropathy.Diabetology & metabolic syndrome · 2025Review
- Advanced Bioactive Polymers and Materials for Nerve Repair: Strategies and Mechanistic Insights.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Review
- A ceramic microbridge microfluidic chip to study osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells in bioactive ceramic immune microenvironment.Bioactive materials · 2025Article
- Enhancing Bone Repair with β-TCP-Based Composite Scaffolds: A Review of Design Strategies and Biological Mechanisms.Orthopedic research and reviews · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The biomedical application of biodegradable polymers for addressing bone-related diseases has garnered considerable attention in recent years. Advances in material technology have expanded the repertoire of materials suitable for orthopedic implants, with nanomaterials playing a pivotal role in replicating crucial surface properties akin to natural tissues. This comprehensive review explores the evaluation of bioactive glass ceramics, shedding light on their properties and applications. The synthesis of composites through composite manufacturing has emerged as a strategy to enhance biocompatibility and biomechanical characteristics. They are addressing challenges associated with conventional implants and nanomaterials, whether in the form of functional nano coatings or nanostructured surfaces, present opportunities to refine implant techniques. Novel developments in orthopedic biomaterials, such as smart biomaterials, porous structures, and 3D implants, offer stimuli-responsive behavior to achieve desired implant shapes and characteristics. Bioactive and biodegradable porous polymer/inorganic composite materials are explored for bone tissue engineering scaffolds, aiming to promote bone formation and regeneration. As a prospective direction, the integration of stem cells into scaffolds hints at the creation of next-generation synthetic/living hybrid biomaterials, displaying high adaptability in biological settings. This review establishes a foundation for nanotechnology-driven biomaterials by elucidating fundamental design factors crucial for orthopedic implant performance and their response to cell differentiation, proliferation, and adhesion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.