Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39247286›Full record

ReviewHeliyon2024

Clean-label alternatives for food preservation: An emerging trend.

Kanika Chauhan, Alka Rao

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Evaluating the Potential ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Nano-Enabled Advances in Tea Tree Essential Oil (Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Intra-Species Response Variability ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kanika ChauhanCSIR-Institute of Microbial Technology, Sector 39A, Chandigarh, 160036, India.
Alka RaoCSIR-Institute of Microbial Technology, Sector 39A, Chandigarh, 160036, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Consumer demand for natural or 'clean-label' food ingredients has risen over the past 50 years and continues growing. Consumers have become more aware of their health and, therefore, insist on transparency in the list of ingredients. Preservatives are the most crucial food additives, ensuring food safety and security. Despite tremendous technological advancements, food preservation remains a significant challenge worldwide, primarily because most are synthetic and non-biodegradable. As a result, the food industry is placing more value on microbiota and other natural sources for bio-preservation, leading to the substitution of conventional processing and chemical preservatives with natural alternatives to ensure 'clean-label.' General Standard for Food Additives (GSFA) includes some of these 'clean-label' options in its list of additives. However, they are very rarely capable of replacing a synthetic preservative on a 'one-for-one' basis, putting pressure on researchers to decipher newer, cleaner, and more economical alternatives. Academic and scientific research has led to the discovery of several plant, animal, and microbial metabolites that may function as effective bio-preservatives. However, most have not yet been put in the market or are under trial. Hence, the present review aims to summarise such relevant and potential metabolites with bio-preservative properties comprehensively. This article will help readers comprehend recent innovations in the 'clean-label' era, provide informed choices to consumers, and improve the business of regulatory approvals.

Indexed as

BacteriocinsClean-labelFermentatesFood preservativesMetabolitesProteins

Identifiers

PMID39247286
PMCPMC11379619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.