Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39247222›Full record

ArticleConference proceedings. International Conference on Image Formation in X-Ray Computed Tomography2024

CT Reconstruction using Nonlinear Diffusion Posterior Sampling with Detector Blur Modeling.

Shudong Li, Xiao Jiang, Yuan Shen, J Webster Stayman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Conference proceedings. International Conference on Image Formation in X-Ray Computed Tomography, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shudong LiElectronic Engineering Department at Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China.
Xiao JiangBiomedical Engineering Department at Johns Hopkins University, baltimore, MD, 21219, USA.
Yuan ShenElectronic Engineering Department at Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China.
J Webster StaymanBiomedical Engineering Department at Johns Hopkins University, baltimore, MD, 21219, USA.

Funding

Nonlinear performance analysis and prediction for robust low dose lung CTR01CA249538 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI GANG, JIANAN GRACE · 2021 to 2024
$2.0M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA249538
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There has been a great deal of work seeking to improve image quality in CT reconstruction through deep-learning-based denoising; however, there are many applications where it is spatial resolution that limits application and diagnostics. In this work, we week to improve spatial resolution in CT reconstructions through a combination of deep learning and physical modeling of detector blur. To achieve this goal, we leverage diffusion models as deep image priors to help regularize a joint deblurring and reconstruction problem. Specifically, we adopt Diffusion Posterior Sampling (DPS) as a way to combine a deep prior with a likelihood-based forward model for the measurements. The model we adopt is nonlinear since detector blur is applied after the nonlinear attenuation given by the Beer-Lambert lab. We trained a score estimator for a CT score-based prior, and then apply Bayes rule to combine this prior with a measurement likelihood score for CT reconstruction with detector blur. We demonstrate the approach in simulated data, and compare image outputs with traditional filtered-backprojection (FBP) and model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) across a range of exposures. We find a particular advantage of the DPS approach for low exposure data and report on major differences in the errors between DPS and classical reconstruction methods.

Identifiers

PMID39247222
PMCPMC11378848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.