ArticleJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2024
Investigating the use of signal detection information in supervised learning-based image denoising with consideration of task-shift.
Article in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: Recently, learning-based denoising methods that incorporate task-relevant information into the training procedure have been developed to enhance the utility of the denoised images. However, this line of research is relatively new and underdeveloped, and some fundamental issues remain unexplored. Our purpose is to yield insights into general issues related to these task-informed methods. This includes understanding the impact of denoising on objective measures of image quality (IQ) when the specified task at inference time is different from that employed for model training, a phenomenon we refer to as "task-shift." Approach: A virtual imaging test bed comprising a stylized computational model of a chest X-ray computed tomography imaging system was employed to enable a controlled and tractable study design. A canonical, fully supervised, convolutional neural network-based denoising method was purposely adopted to understand the underlying issues that may be relevant to a variety of applications and more advanced denoising or image reconstruction methods. Signal detection and signal detection-localization tasks under signal-known-statistically with background-known-statistically conditions were considered, and several distinct types of numerical observers were employed to compute estimates of the task performance. Studies were designed to reveal how a task-informed transfer-learning approach can influence the tradeoff between conventional and task-based measures of image quality within the context of the considered tasks. In addition, the impact of task-shift on these image quality measures was assessed. Results: The results indicated that certain tradeoffs can be achieved such that the resulting AUC value was significantly improved and the degradation of physical IQ measures was statistically insignificant. It was also observed that introducing task-shift degrades the task performance as expected. The degradation was significant when a relatively simple task was considered for network training and observer performance on a more complex one was assessed at inference time. Conclusions: The presented results indicate that the task-informed training method can improve the observer performance while providing control over the tradeoff between traditional and task-based measures of image quality. The behavior of a task-informed model fine-tuning procedure was demonstrated, and the impact of task-shift on task-based image quality measures was investigated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.