Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39247093›Full record

ArticleDigital health

Digital leadership: Norwegian healthcare managers' attitudes towards using digital tools.

Jannike Dyb Oksavik, Erlend Vik, Ralf Kirchhoff

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jannike Dyb OksavikDepartment of Health Sciences, Aalesund, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Aalesund, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5394-7463
Erlend VikFaculty of Business Administration and Social Sciences, Molde University College, Molde, Norway.
Ralf KirchhoffDepartment of Health Sciences, Aalesund, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Aalesund, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Health services are undergoing digitalization and applying new digital tools. These changes may provide healthcare managers with opportunities to exercise digital leadership. However, managers' attitudes may influence the extent to which they demonstrate digital leadership. This study explores the attitudes of Norwegian healthcare managers towards: (1) digital tools and change and (2) to what extent digital tools are applicable to various tasks of managers. Methods: Cross-sectional study including 154 managers in hospitals and municipal health services in a Norwegian county. The questionnaire was about management and digital tools, and the data was analyzed by descriptive statistics, correlations, and content analysis. Results: The healthcare managers perceived that digital tools facilitated a positive change in organizational work processes aligned with values and goals. Digital tools supported administrative tasks such as gaining control over responsibilities. However, 76 managers stated that certain tasks, including interactions with employees (e.g. performance appraisals and sick leave follow-up) and the building of an organizational culture, should not be performed using digital tools or using them only to a limited extent; for these tasks, they preferred in-person meetings. Discussion: Norwegian healthcare managers' attitudes toward digital tools are generally positive, but there are areas where they find the tools less suitable. Conclusions: The results provide new insights into healthcare by indicating that many managers may have positive attitudes toward digital tools. However, digital leadership may not be applicable equally in all areas of healthcare managers' work. This raises the question of whether digital leadership can or should be exercised uniformly in every area of health services.

Indexed as

digital leadershipdigital toolsHealthcare managementhospitalorganization and administrationprimary health care

Identifiers

PMID39247093
PMCPMC11378210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.