ArticleDigital health
Chinese colposcopists' attitudes toward the colposcopic artificial intelligence auxiliary diagnostic system (CAIADS): A nation-wide, multi-center survey.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A quantitative study of pathologists' perceptions towards artificial intelligence-assisted diagnostic system.PLOS digital health · 2025Article
- Attitudes, Perceptions, and Factors Influencing the Adoption of AI in Health Care Among Medical Staff: Nationwide Cross-Sectional Survey Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Deep learning enabled liquid-based cytology model for cervical precancer and cancer detection.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The objective of this study was to assess the attitudes toward the Colposcopic Artificial Intelligence Auxiliary Diagnostic System (CAIADS) of colposcopists working in mainland China. Methods: A questionnaire was developed to collect participants' sociodemographic information and assess their awareness, attitudes, and acceptance toward the CAIADS. Results: There were 284 respondents from 24 provinces across mainland China, with 55% working in primary care institutions. Participant data were divided into two subgroups based on their colposcopy case load per year (i.e. ≥50 cases; <50 cases). The analysis showed that participants with higher loads had more experience working with CAIADS and were more knowledgeable about CAIADS and AI systems. Overall, in both groups, about half of the participants understood the potential applications of big data and AI-assisted diagnostic systems in medicine. Although less than one-third of the participants were knowledgeable about CAIADS and its latest developments, more than 90% of the participants were open with the idea of using CAIADS. Conclusions: While a related lack of acknowledgement of CAIADS exists, the participants in general had an open attitude toward CAIADS. Practical experience with colposcopy or CAIADS contributed to participants' awareness and positive attitudes. The promotion of AI tools like CAIADS could help address regional health inequities to improve women's well-being, especially in low- and middle-income countries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.