ArticleJournal of hematology2024
Long-Term Outcome of Eltrombopag With First-Line Immunosuppressive Therapy for Newly Diagnosed Severe Aplastic Anemia.
Article in Journal of hematology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Real-world use of thrombopoietic agents in treatment-naïve children with severe aplastic anemia: a multicenter retrospective study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Review
- Clinical impact of quality nursing combined with health education pathway on quality of life and sleep in severe aplastic anemia patients complicated with infection: a randomized clinical trial.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: To investigate whether the addition of eltrombopag (EPAG) to rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG)-based immunosuppressive therapy (IST) for newly diagnosed severe aplastic anemia (SAA) improves outcomes and affects the cumulative incidence of clonal evolution (CE), we conducted a multicenter retrospective analysis. Methods: Data were collected from 101 patients, aged 15 - 65 years, undergoing initial IST. Results: No significant imbalance in age, sex, or severity was observed between the EPAG (n = 20) and non-EPAG (n = 81) groups. The median duration of EPAG administration in EPAG group was 16.1 months (range: 0.6 - 41.1 months). Six months after the initiation of IST, the complete response (CR) rate significantly improved in the EPAG group (P < 0.01). The cumulative incidence of allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) at 2 years and the 2-year overall survival (OS) were not significantly different between the two groups (allo-SCT, P = 0.31; OS, P = 0.64). Grade 3-4 adverse events in the EPAG group and the cumulative incidence of CE (P = 0.96) showed no increase. Conclusion: In summary, IST showed significantly better initial efficacy in the EPAG group. Although the addition of EPAG did not reduce the need for allo-SCT, no increase was observed in the incidence of CE with long-term EPAG use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.