ReviewCureus2024
A Systematic Review on Biomarkers: Are There Reliable Molecular Biomarkers in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease?
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Elevated serum Slit3 independently predicts disease activity and interstitial lung disease in rheumatoid arthritis.Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2026Article
- Consecutive intrabronchial administration of Wharton's jelly-derived mesenchymal stromal cells in ECMO-supported pediatric patients with end-stage interstitial lung disease: a safety and feasibility study (CIBA method).Stem cell research & therapy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite advances in the study of rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD), the pulmonary manifestation remains an important cause of morbidity and mortality. However, there is a lack of biochemical markers for this manifestation in the literature. Therefore, the objective of this study was to carry out a qualitative systematic review on biochemical markers associated with RA-ILD in the PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Virtual Health Library (VHL) between January 2015 and July 2024, using the following descriptors: #1 "biomarkers" (MeSH) AND #2 "rheumatoid arthritis" (MeSH) AND #3 "Lung Diseases, Interstitial" (MeSH). Of the 1497 articles found, 27 presented eligibility criteria. The findings were divided into three sessions: "Main biomarkers for RA-ILD," "Other biomarkers for RA-ILD activity," and "Other biomarkers for RA-ILD prognosis." Among the evaluated markers, KL-6, RF, ACPA, ESR, and CRP appear to have prognostic value and association with damage in patients with RA-ILD. The association of some molecules such as sPD-1, sCD25, VCAM-1, MCP-1, and ADMA with tissue damage is intriguing. Longitudinal and randomized studies are imperative to comprehensively delineate the history of RA-ILD and evaluate potential serum biomarkers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.