ArticleCureus2024
Primary Angle Closure Observed During a House Visit: A Case Treated With Laser Iridotomy.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Telemedicine-based diagnosis and management of ocular chemical injury in a remote setting: A case report.Journal of general and family medicine · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Laser iridotomy (LI) is an effective treatment for patients with pupillary block mechanisms. Here, we report a case of LI performed on a patient with primary angle closure (PAC) and elevated intraocular pressure (IOP), who was unsuitable for other treatments due to specific social circumstances. The patient, a 97-year-old female residing in a private nursing home, had a medical history notable only for mild dementia and was wheelchair-bound. She had not undergone ophthalmologic evaluation for over 50 years. The patient presented with intermittent tenderness and redness in the left eye. Therefore, an ophthalmologist visited the nursing home. Examination revealed visual acuity of 20/200 in the right eye and 20/100 in the left eye, IOP of 24 mmHg in the right eye and 26 mmHg in the left eye, no conjunctival hyperemia, shallow anterior chambers, and nuclear sclerosis grade 4 cataracts in both eyes. Fundus examination was challenging due to lens opacity, and both optic nerve papillae appeared pale. Given her history of episodic eye pain and hyperemia, PAC was diagnosed. Treatment options, including eye drops and cataract surgery, were discussed. However, the patient opted for LI due to her advanced age and inability to attend frequent follow-up visits. LI was successfully performed on both eyes during her visit to the clinic. One week post-procedure, IOP decreased to 12 mmHg bilaterally, with no complications. This case demonstrates that LI can be a viable option for managing PAC and high IOP in patients who are not candidates for surgery or eye drops due to social constraints.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.