ReviewCureus2024
Troubleshooting Vaginal Stents: A Critical Review of Common Problems and Solutions.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome type II. Case report.JBRA assisted reproduction · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This review aims to examine the use of vaginal stents in clinical practice, specifically for treating vaginal agenesis and related complications and problem associated with vaginal stents. Vaginal agenesis, also known as Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser (MRKH) syndrome, is a congenital disorder characterized by the uterus not developing or developing only partially. Vaginal stents are medical devices that preserve the structural integrity and patency of the vaginal canal after trauma or surgery. They play an important part in gynecological treatments such as post-radiation therapy, reconstructive surgery, and vaginal stenosis management. The review also discusses the primary applications of vaginal stents, such as preventing adhesions, healing mucosa, and maintaining patency. It also investigates frequent concerns associated with stent use, such as complications and the need for better designs. Vaginal stents are essential in a variety of therapeutic settings, providing major benefits in maintaining vaginal tissue and function. However, their use is fraught with complications, including the risk of infection, discomfort, and the possibility of inappropriate placement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.