Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39246952›Full record

ReviewCureus2024

Troubleshooting Vaginal Stents: A Critical Review of Common Problems and Solutions.

Shruti Deshmukh, Madhu Priya, Sweta G Pisulkar, Surekha A Dubey, Arushi Beri, Akansha Bansod, Ritul Jain

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Shruti DeshmukhProsthodontics, Crown and Bridge, Sharad Pawar Dental College and Hospital, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, IND.
Madhu PriyaProsthodontics, Sharad Pawar Dental College and Hospital, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, IND.
Sweta G PisulkarProsthodontics, Crown and Bridge, Sharad Pawar Dental College and Hospital, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, IND.
Surekha A DubeyProsthodontics, Sharad Pawar Dental College and Hospital, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, IND.
Arushi BeriProsthodontics, Crown and Bridge, Sharad Pawar Dental College and Hospital, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, IND.
Akansha BansodProsthodontics, Crown and Bridge, Sharad Pawar Dental College and Hospital, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, IND.
Ritul JainProsthodontics, Crown and Bridge, Sharad Pawar Dental College and Hospital, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review aims to examine the use of vaginal stents in clinical practice, specifically for treating vaginal agenesis and related complications and problem associated with vaginal stents. Vaginal agenesis, also known as Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser (MRKH) syndrome, is a congenital disorder characterized by the uterus not developing or developing only partially. Vaginal stents are medical devices that preserve the structural integrity and patency of the vaginal canal after trauma or surgery. They play an important part in gynecological treatments such as post-radiation therapy, reconstructive surgery, and vaginal stenosis management. The review also discusses the primary applications of vaginal stents, such as preventing adhesions, healing mucosa, and maintaining patency. It also investigates frequent concerns associated with stent use, such as complications and the need for better designs. Vaginal stents are essential in a variety of therapeutic settings, providing major benefits in maintaining vaginal tissue and function. However, their use is fraught with complications, including the risk of infection, discomfort, and the possibility of inappropriate placement.

Indexed as

mrkh syndromepatient compliancesilicone stentvaginal stenosisvaginal stents

Identifiers

PMID39246952
PMCPMC11379100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.