Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39246948›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Revolutionizing Intracranial Hemorrhage Diagnosis: A Retrospective Analytical Study of Viz.ai ICH for Enhanced Diagnostic Accuracy.

Mona P Roshan, Seema A Al-Shaikhli, Italo Linfante, Thompson T Antony, Jamie E Clarke, Raihan Noman, Chrisnel Lamy, Sean Britton, Starlie C Belnap, Kevin Abrams and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Mona P RoshanRadiology, Florida International University, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Miami, USA.
Seema A Al-ShaikhliRadiology, Florida International University, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Miami, USA.
Italo LinfanteMiami Neuroscience Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, USA.
Thompson T AntonyRadiology, Florida International University, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Miami, USA.
Jamie E ClarkeRadiology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, USA.
Raihan NomanRadiology, Florida International University, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Miami, USA.
Chrisnel LamyEpidemiology and Biostatistics, Florida International University, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Miami, USA.
Sean BrittonRadiology, Florida State University, Miami, USA.
Starlie C BelnapMiami Neuroscience Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, USA.
Kevin AbramsRadiology, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, USA.
Charif SidaniRadiology, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Artificial intelligence (AI) alerts the radiologist to the presence of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) as fast as 1-2 minutes from scan completion, leading to faster diagnosis and treatment. We wanted to validate a new AI application called Viz.ai ICH to improve the diagnosis of suspected ICH. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of 4,203 consecutive non-contrast brain computed tomography (CT) reports in a single institution between September 1, 2021, and January 31, 2022. The reports were made by neuroradiologists who reviewed each case for the presence of ICH. Reports and identified cases with positive findings for ICH were reviewed. Positive cases were categorized based on subtype, timing, and size/volume. Viz.ai ICH output was reviewed for positive cases. This AI model was validated by assessing its performance with Viz.ai ICH as the index test compared to the neuroradiologists' interpretation as the gold standard. Results According to neuroradiologists, 9.2% of non-contrast brain CT reports were positive for ICH. The sensitivity of Viz.ai ICH was 85%, specificity was 98%, positive predictive value was 81%, and negative predictive value was 99%. Subgroup analysis was performed based on intraparenchymal, subarachnoid, subdural, and intraventricular subtypes. Sensitivities were 94%, 79%, 83%, and 44%, respectively. Further stratification revealed sensitivity improves with higher acuity and volume/size across subtypes. Conclusion Our analysis indicates that AI can accurately detect ICH's presence, particularly for large-volume/large-size ICH. The paper introduces a novel AI model for detecting ICH. This advancement contributes to the field by revolutionizing ICH detection and improving patient outcomes.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceartificial intelligence in radiologyintracranial hemorrhage (ich)intraparenchymal hemorrhageintraventricular hemorrhageradiology and imagingstrokesubarachnoid hemorrhagesubdural hemorrhagetechnology

Identifiers

PMID39246948
PMCPMC11380645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.