Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39246940›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Multiple Bee Stings and Acute Kidney Injury: A Case Report.

Veena V, Hemant Mehta, Preeti Dhingra, Anil Ballani

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Veena VDepartment of Medicine, Lilavati Hospital and Research Centre, Mumbai, IND.
Hemant MehtaDepartment of Nephrology, Lilavati Hospital and Research Centre, Mumbai, IND.
Preeti DhingraDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Lilavati Hospital and Research Centre, Mumbai, IND.
Anil BallaniDepartment of Medicine, Lilavati Hospital and Research Centre, Mumbai, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication following multiple honey bee stings and usually presents after 24-48 hours following the incidence. The severity of AKI is related to the number of stings. A single sting can cause an allergic reaction, and as the stings increase, a higher amount of venom is inoculated, leading to systemic poisoning. Bee venom can have direct or indirect effects on the kidneys. AKI is a combination of toxic and ischemic acute tubular necrosis. Patients may require dialysis, and the usual renal recovery time is 4-120 days. The patient with multiple honey bee stings needs emergency medical treatment, sometimes in the ICU setting, with the aim of treating or preventing anaphylaxis reactions. A case of AKI due to multiple honey bee stings is presented, which is rare but a known occurrence. The patient survived with a recovery of renal function.

Indexed as

acute kidney injurybee sting induced aki case reportconservative management of akipathophysiology of bee sting induced akirecovery from aki after bee stingsretrieval of a dead honeybee from a living patient

Identifiers

PMID39246940
PMCPMC11381098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.