ArticleCureus2024
Edema and Trismus Assessment After Applying Kinesiotape With the Web Strip Technique Compared With Cryotherapy: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesExtraction of impacted third molars is one of the most common oral surgeries performed in the dental clinic, which is often accompanied by many complications such as edema and trismus. Many methods have been used to alleviate these complications, such as drugs or physical therapy. Kinesiotape (KT) has recently spread as a popular physical method for eliminating complications after surgical extraction of lower third molars after its long-term use in sports medicine and injuries of the musculoskeletal system. The current study aimed to study the effect of using KT (Kinesio METHODOLOGY: This study was designed as a randomized controlled clinical trial using the split-mouth technique and included 25 patients with radiographically symmetrical lower third molars from patients. All surgical extractions were performed by a single surgeon under sterile conditions according to the standard surgical protocol after that one group applied KT and the other group applied cryotherapy. Edema and trismus were measured in the first five days. Data was collected and analyzed by SPSS software (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).
resultsThe mean change in the total linear facial measurements in the experimental group (Kinesio Group) was 12.32 mm three days after surgery, and then this value decreased to 6.80 mm, while the average increase in the control group (Cryo Group) was 17.00 mm after three days, then the value decreased to 9.68 mm five days after surgery. Regarding the changes in the amount of maximum mouth opening after surgery, the results were similar between the Kinesio Group and the Cryo Group, as there were no significant differences between the two groups (P<0.05).
conclusionThis study concluded that KT was superior to cryotherapy when studying edema. The current study also concluded that the mouth opening was similar between the two study groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.