ArticleCureus2024
Characteristics of Traumatic Versus Atraumatic Rotator Cuff Tears in Patients Under 50 Years of Age.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe prevalence of rotator cuff tears (RCTs) is known to be lower in younger patients compared to older patients. Recent studies in patients less than 50 years of age who sustain an RCT have focused on etiology, pathogenesis, and clinical outcomes following treatment. There are fewer studies that have focused on the demographics and clinical characteristics that may predispose this patient population to develop a tear. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the difference in risk factors for degenerative tears compared to traumatic tears in patients under 50 years of age.
methodsThis single-center retrospective study utilized an internal registry of patients who had RCT injuries identified by the International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-10 code M75.1x and confirmed by MRI between 2018 and 2023. Patients 50 years of age or younger were included and then classified into traumatic versus atraumatic RCT etiology groups. Demographics, tear characteristics, and clinical comorbidities were compared between the cohorts. Statistical analyses included a two-sided student's t-test, Wilcoxon rank-sum test, Chi-square test, and Fisher's exact test.
resultsA total of 177 patients under 50 years of age were identified. There was a higher prevalence of traumatic tears (59.9% vs. 40.1%; p = 0.008), the majority of whom identified as male (75.5% vs. 49.3%, p<0.001) when compared to the atraumatic cohort. Full-thickness tears were more likely to be traumatic (p = 0.04) and seen in patients insured by workers' compensation (p = 0.05). There was no significant difference in the age or preoperative comorbidities between the two groups.
conclusionsOur study reveals a higher incidence of traumatic RCTs in a younger patient group. Sex, severity of tear, and workers' compensation were found to differ between traumatic and atraumatic cohorts. Further research is required to understand the interplay of these factors in younger patients' tear risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.