ArticleCureus2024
Improving Medical and Surgical Care: A Qualitative Study of Medical Students' Experience With Language Barriers in Healthcare.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Mind your language: enhancing medical student learning during non-English language consultations.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective This study aims to investigate the experiences of medical students in teaching and practice concerning communication with patients exhibiting limited English proficiency (LEP). With a growing population in the United Kingdom facing language barriers, this research explores the challenges encountered by medical students, emphasizing the need for enhanced medical education in this domain. Methods A qualitative technique was used to recruit 20 medical students enrolled in a Medicine MBBS degree program at a UK institution. Convenience sampling was utilized, and five separate focus groups were conducted. Semi-structured interview schedules guided discussions surrounding encounters with patients necessitating the use of interpreters. Thematic analysis was employed to identify recurring patterns and themes. Results Three primary themes emerged from the data analysis: interpersonal relations, feasibility, and duties and responsibilities. The findings underscore the challenges faced by medical students when communicating with patients having LEP. The study provides valuable insights into the nuanced aspects of these encounters, shedding light on the complex interplay between language barriers and effective healthcare delivery. Conclusion This research contributes to the limited body of qualitative literature on medical students' experiences in managing language barriers with patients. The identified themes provide a foundation for modifying medical education curricula to better equip students to address communication challenges associated with linguistic diversity. The study advocates for the integration of these experiences into medical training, emphasizing the broader implications for healthcare delivery and the reduction of health inequalities in linguistically diverse patient populations. The study also recommends the usage of up-to-date translation services built into the electronic healthcare records. This relationship minimizes inaccuracy in presenting the results of patient diagnostic films and tests, reduces wait times for treatment, and contributes to an overall cost reduction within this healthcare sector.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.