ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2024
Development and Validation of Radiomics-Based Models for Predicting the Parametrial Invasion in Stage IB1 to IIA2 Cervical Cancer.
Article in International journal of general medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Preoperative prediction of parametrial invasion in early-stage cervical cancer: a radiomics nomogram fusing multi-parametric MRI and clinical biomarkers.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
- Radiomics based on habitat analysis in predicting parametrial invasion of early stage cervical cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence radiomics in the diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of gynecological cancer: a literature review.Translational cancer research · 2025Review
- Multiparametric MRI-based radiomics for preoperative prediction of parametrial invasion in early-stage cervical cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To develop an early warning system that enables accurate parametrial invasion (PMI) risk prediction in cervical cancer patients with early-stage. Methods: We retrospectively collected 218 early-stage cervical cancer patients who were treated in Jingzhou Central Hospital from January 31, 2015, to January 31, 2023, and diagnosed with early stage cervical cancer by pathology. The prediction model training is achieved by randomly dividing 70% of the training queue population, with the remaining 30% used as the testing queue. Then, a prediction model based on machine learning algorithms (including random forest, generalized linear regression, decision tree, support vector machine, and artificial neural network) is constructed to predict the risk of PMI occurrence. Ultimately, the analysis of receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) and decision curve analysis (DCA) is used to evaluate the predictive ability of various prediction models. Results: We finally included radiomics-based candidate variables that can be used for PMI model. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that energy, correlation, sum entropy (SUE), entropy, mean sum (MES), variance of differences (DIV), and inverse difference (IND) were independent risk factors for PMI occurrence. The predictive performance AUC of five types of machine learning ranges from 0.747 to 0.895 in the training set and can also reach a high accuracy of 0.905 in the testing set, indicating that the predictive model has ideal robustness. Conclusion: Our ML-based model incorporating GLCM parameters can predict PMI in cervical cancer patients with stage IB1 to IIA2, particularly the RFM, which could contribute to distinguishing PMI before surgery, especially in assisting decision-making on surgical scope.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.