ArticleSurgical neurology international2024
A rescue treatment to release the twist of a flow re-direction endoluminal device.
Article in Surgical neurology international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: A flow redirection endoluminal device (FRED) is a widely used flow diverter stent. Although high technical success and good treatment results were reported in the SAFE study, cases of technical failure of deployment have also been reported. A case in which a FRED was deployed with the proximal part twisted, but successful deployment was achieved, is presented. Case Description: A woman in her 40s was diagnosed with a left internal carotid artery aneurysm during radiological investigations for headaches. Due to her family's strong history of cerebral aneurysms, she opted for preventive treatment. A 5.5-mm FRED was selected because the proximal vessel diameter was ≥5 mm. However, the stent was deployed with the proximal side twisted. Fortunately, using a Scepter C and a CHIKAI 315 cm, the true lumen could be secure, the wire was guided distally, and the FRED was successfully placed. Later, with the patient's consent, a 3D blood vessel model was created, and whether the stent was difficult to open or whether it was just a technical problem which was verified experimentally. Precisely, the same situation as during the surgery was recreated, and the stent was deployed in the same way. Conclusion: A FRED is an effective device, but there are cases of difficult deployment. The present method may be an option if a FRED is difficult to open.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.