ArticleSurgical neurology international2024
Management of concurrent symptomatic tuberculum sellae meningioma and idiopathic intracranial hypertension: A case report.
Article in Surgical neurology international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Coexisting intracranial pathologies of distinct etiology which require intervention are rare. Only a handful of cases have been reported in the literature. The effects of each treatment option on both pathologies need to be considered during management. We describe the first report of the management of a patient with concurrent symptomatic tuberculum sellae meningioma (TSM) and idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH). Case Description: A 58-year-old male presented with 2 weeks of vision loss and 3 months of headaches. He was found to have an inferior hemi-field deficit in the left eye and bilateral papilledema. Imaging studies revealed bilateral transverse sinus stenosis and a TSM abutting the left optic nerve. The opening pressure was 40 cmH2O. An expanded-endoscopic endonasal approach was performed for mass resection. Intraoperatively, a lumbar drain was placed to aid skull base repair integrity before definitive treatment was obtained. On postoperative day 9, a right transverse-sigmoid sinus stent was placed for IIH treatment. The patient was discharged the following day. Conclusion: Our management of this patient targeted the etiologies of each symptomatic pathology. Stenting provided treatment for the IIH and mass resection for the vision loss. Both the order and approaches to treatment were felt to maximize patient benefit while minimizing harm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.