Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39246648›Full record

ArticleIEEE/ASME transactions on mechatronics : a joint publication of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society and the ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Division2024

Design and Validation of a Novel Robotic Neck Brace for Cervical Traction.

Priya Kulkarni, Sunil K Agrawal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE/ASME transactions on mechatronics : a joint publication of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society and the ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Division, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Evaluating Range of Motion of Two Prominent Neck Support Devices for Daily Activities.IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Priya KulkarniP. Kulkarni and S. K. Agrawal are with the Robotics and Rehabilitation Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027 USA.
Sunil K AgrawalP. Kulkarni and S. K. Agrawal are with the Robotics and Rehabilitation Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027 USA.

Funding

Promoting Functional Neck Motion in Patients with Cerebral Palsy using a Robotic Neck BraceR21HD110868 · NICHD · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI AGRAWAL, SUNIL K. · 2023 to 2023
$458k
NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD110868
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cervical traction is a common and effective treatment for degenerative disk diseases and pain in the cervical spine. However, the manual or mechanical methods of applying traction to the head-neck are limited due to variability in the applied forces and orientation of the head-neck relative to the shoulder during the procedure. Current robotic neck braces are not designed to provide independent rotation angles and independent vertical translation, or traction, to the brace end-effector connected to the head, making them unsuitable for traction application. This work proposes a novel architecture of a robotic neck brace, which can provide vertical traction to the head while keeping the head in a prescribed orientation, with flexion and lateral bending angles. In this paper, the kinematics of the end-effector attached to the head relative to a coordinate frame on the shoulders are described as well as the velocity kinematics and force control. The paper also describes benchtop experiments designed to validate the position control and the ability of the brace to provide a vertical traction force. It was shown that the maximum achievable end-effector orientations are 16° in flexion, 13.9° in extension, and ± 6.5° in lateral bending. The kinematic model of the active brace was validated using an independent motion capture system with a maximum root mean square error of 2.41°. In three different orientations of the end-effector, neutral, flexed, and laterally bent, the brace was able to provide a consistent upward traction force during intermittent force application. In these configurations, the force error has standard deviations of 0.55, 0.29, and 0.07N, respectively. This work validates the mechanism's ability to achieve a range of head orientations and provide consistent upward traction force in these orientations, making it a promising intervention tool in cases of cervical disk degeneration.

Indexed as

Kinematic AnalysisParallel MechanismsRehabilitation Robots

Identifiers

PMID39246648
PMCPMC11378956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.