ArticleCureus2024
Prognostic Value of the Lactate/Albumin Ratio for 28-Day Mortality in Pediatric Septic Shock: A Prospective Cohort Study.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association of Early and Late Postnatal Serum Lactate/Albumin Ratio and Retinopathy of Prematurity in Preterm Infants: A 2 Time Point Comparative Study.The Eurasian journal of medicine · 2026Article
- Development and Validation of a Prediction Model for Early ARDS in Children with Sepsis in the PICU: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Article
- Shock-Stratified Prognostic Performance of Lactate and Procalcitonin in Pediatric Sepsis In-Hospital Mortality; A Retrospective Cohort Study.Archives of academic emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Association between lactate-to-albumin ratio and 28-day ICU mortality in pediatric severe pneumonia patients.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Septic shock remains a leading cause of mortality in children. The lactate/albumin ratio (LAR) has emerged as a potential prognostic marker for mortality in septic shock, yet most existing research focuses on adults, with limited data available for pediatric populations, particularly in Vietnam. Objectives This study aims to evaluate the prognostic utility of the LAR in predicting 28-day mortality among children aged two months to 15 years with septic shock in Vietnam. Methods We conducted a prospective cohort study involving children diagnosed with septic shock at the largest pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam, from July 2022 to June 2024. Clinical and laboratory parameters, including lactate and albumin levels, were measured at the time of septic shock diagnosis. Patients were followed for 28 days, with outcomes categorized as either survival or mortality. The prognostic performance of LAR was assessed through its discrimination and calibration capabilities. Results The 28-day mortality rate was 63.4%. LAR was significantly higher in non-survivors compared to survivors (p < 0.001). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for LAR was 0.91, indicating superior discriminatory power compared to lactate alone and comparable to albumin. Using a Youden index-derived cut-off of 1.84, LAR demonstrated a sensitivity of 84.6% and a specificity of 80%. Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank testing revealed significantly lower survival probabilities in children with LAR ≥1.84 (p < 0.05). The Hosmer-Lemeshow test confirmed good calibration of LAR in mortality prediction (p > 0.05). Conclusion The lactate/albumin ratio exhibits excellent discriminatory and calibration properties, making it a valuable tool for predicting 28-day mortality in pediatric septic shock. This ratio should be considered for routine use in clinical practice to improve prognostic assessments in this vulnerable population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.