ArticleRisk management and healthcare policy2024
Development and Validation of a Nomogram Model for Accurately Predicting Depression in Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study in China.
Article in Risk management and healthcare policy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Self-perceptions of aging and associated factors among older patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis: a latent profile analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- A time-updated scoring system derived from a nomogram to predict 3-month mortality in maintenance hemodialysis patients.Frontiers in aging · 2026Article
- Development and Internal Validation of Machine Learning-Based Risk Prediction Models for Depression in Older Adults Undergoing Maintenance Hemodialysis.Clinical interventions in aging · 2026Article
- Biochemical Associations with Depression, Anxiety, and Stress in Hemodialysis: The Role of Albumin, Calcium, and βBiomedicines · 2025Article
- Exploring health challenges and coping strategies in young patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis: a qualitative study.BMC nephrology · 2025Article
- Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting depression risk in patients with chronic kidney disease based on NHANES 2005-2018.Journal of health, population, and nutrition · 2025Article
- Development and validation of nursing-oriented risk prediction models for anxiety and depression in hospitalized patients with chronic kidney disease: a retrospective cross-sectional study in Southwest China.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Depression is a major concern in maintenance hemodialysis. However, given the elusive nature of its risk factors and the redundant nature of existing assessment forms for judging depression, further research is necessary. Therefore, this study was devoted to exploring the risk factors for depression in maintenance hemodialysis patients and to developing and validating a predictive model for assessing depression in maintenance hemodialysis patients. Patients and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted from May 2022 to December 2022, and we recruited maintenance hemodialysis patients from a multicentre hemodialysis centre. Risk factors were identified by Lasso regression analysis and a Nomogram model was developed to predict depressed patients on maintenance hemodialysis. The predictive accuracy of the model was assessed by ROC curves, area under the ROC (AUC), consistency index (C-index), and calibration curves, and its applicability in clinical practice was evaluated using decision curves (DCA). Results: A total of 175 maintenance hemodialysis patients were included in this study, and cases were randomised into a training set of 148 and a validation set of 27 (split ratio 8.5:1.5), with a depression prevalence of 29.1%. Based on age, employment, albumin, and blood uric acid, a predictive map of depression was created, and in the training set, the nomogram had an AUC of 0.7918, a sensitivity of 61.9%, and a specificity of 89.2%. In the validation set, the nomogram had an AUC of 0.810, a sensitivity of 100%, and a specificity of 61.1%. The bootstrap-based internal validation showed a c-index of 0.792, while the calibration curve showed a strong correlation between actual and predicted depression risk. Decision curve analysis (DCA) results indicated that the predictive model was clinically useful. Conclusion: The nomogram constructed in this study can be used to identify depression conditions in vulnerable groups quickly, practically and reliably.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.