Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39246586›Full record

ArticleF1000Research2023

Teaching critical thinking about health information and choices in secondary schools: human-centred design of digital resources.

Sarah Rosenbaum, Jenny Moberg, Faith Chesire, Michael Mugisha, Ronald Ssenyonga, Marlyn A Ochieng, Clarisse Marie Claudine Simbi, Esther Nakyejwe, Benson Ngatia, Gabriel Rada and 22 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in F1000Research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

32 authors.

Sarah RosenbaumCentre for Epidemic Interventions Research, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, 0213, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-8334-7664
Jenny MobergCentre for Epidemic Interventions Research, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, 0213, Norway.
Faith ChesireTropical Institute of Community Health and Development in Africa, Kisumu, Kenya.
Michael MugishaInstitute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, Universitetet i Oslo, Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Ronald SsenyongaInstitute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, Universitetet i Oslo, Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Marlyn A OchiengTropical Institute of Community Health and Development in Africa, Kisumu, Kenya.ORCID 0000-0002-0455-8517
Clarisse Marie Claudine SimbiSchool of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Rwanda, Butare, Southern Province, Rwanda.
Esther NakyejweSchool of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Central Region, Uganda.
Benson NgatiaTropical Institute of Community Health and Development in Africa, Kisumu, Kenya.
Gabriel RadaEpistemonikos Foundation, Santiago, Santiago Metropolitan Region, Chile.
Juan Vásquez-LavalEpistemonikos Foundation, Santiago, Santiago Metropolitan Region, Chile.
José Damián GarridoEpistemonikos Foundation, Santiago, Santiago Metropolitan Region, Chile.
Grace BagumaNational Curriculum Development Centre, Kampala, Uganda.
Sam KulobaMinistry of Education and Sports, Kampala, Uganda.
Edward SebukyuMinistry of Education and Sports, Kampala, Uganda.
Richard KabandaFaculty of Health Sciences, Uganda Martyrs University, Kampala, Central Region, Uganda.
Irene MwenyangoMinistry of Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Tonny MuzaaleUganda National Examinations Board, Kampala, Uganda.
Pamela NandiHuma Girls Secondary School, Kisumu, Kenya.
Jane NjueKenya Institute of Curriculum Development, Nairobi, Kenya.
Cyril OyugaKenya Institute of Curriculum Development, Nairobi, Kenya.
Florian RutiyombaRwanda Basic Education Board, Kigali, Rwanda.
Felecien RugengamanziRwanda Basic Education Board, Kigali, Rwanda.
Joan MurungiRwanda Basic Education Board, Kigali, Rwanda.
Allen NsangiSchool of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Central Region, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0001-8702-9217
Daniel SemakulaSchool of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Central Region, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0002-0806-213X
Margaret KasejeTropical Institute of Community Health and Development in Africa, Kisumu, Kenya.ORCID 0000-0001-9789-1927
Nelson SewankamboSchool of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Central Region, Uganda.
Laetitia NyirazinyoyeSchool of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Rwanda, Butare, Southern Province, Rwanda.
Simon LewinCentre for Epidemic Interventions Research, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, 0213, Norway.
Andrew D OxmanCentre for Epidemic Interventions Research, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, 0213, Norway.
Matt OxmanCentre for Epidemic Interventions Research, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, 0213, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-6323-9620

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Learning to thinking critically about health information and choices can protect people from unnecessary suffering, harm, and resource waste. Earlier work revealed that children can learn these skills, but printing costs and curricula compatibility remain important barriers to school implementation. We aimed to develop a set of digital learning resources for students to think critically about health that were suitable for use in Kenyan, Rwandan, and Ugandan secondary schools. Methods: We conducted work in two phases collaborating with teachers, students, schools, and national curriculum development offices using a human-centred design approach. First, we conducted context analyses and an overview of teaching strategies, prioritised content and collected examples. Next, we developed lessons and guidance iteratively, informed by data from user-testing, individual and group interviews, and school pilots. Results: Final resources include online lesson plans, teachers' guide, and extra resources, with lesson plans in two modes, for use in a classroom equipped with a blackboard/flip-chart and a projector. The resources are accessible offline for use when electricity or Internet is lacking. Teachers preferred the projector mode, as it provided structure and a focal point for class attention. Feedback was largely positive, with teachers and students appreciating the learning and experiencing it as relevant. Four main challenges included time to teach lessons; incorrect comprehension; identifying suitable examples; and technical, logistical, and behavioural challenges with a student-computer mode that we piloted. We resolved challenges by simplifying and combining lessons; increasing opportunities for review and assessment; developing teacher training materials, creating a searchable set of examples; and deactivating the student-computer mode. Conclusion: Using a human-centred design approach, we created digital resources for teaching secondary school students to think critically about health actions and for training teachers. Be smart about your health resources are open access and can be translated or adapted to other settings.

Indexed as

SchoolsChoice BehaviorCurriculumHealth EducationHumansKenyaStudentsTeachingThinkingUgandacritical health literacycritical thinkingeducational designhealth educationhuman centred designinfodemicinformed decision makingsecondary school

Identifiers

PMID39246586
PMCPMC11377934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.