ArticleHand therapy2024
Occupation-based practice in hand therapy - perspectives from a South African occupational therapy survey.
Article in Hand therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Hand injuries affect occupational engagement and participation, yet anecdotal evidence reports a focus on body structures and functions within hand therapy. Failing to address occupational challenges may result in sub-optimal patient outcomes. In line with the growing body of evidence of positive outcomes relating to occupation-based practice (OBP), this article aimed to describe the knowledge, attitudes and practices towards OBP of occupational therapists treating hand-related conditions in South Africa. Methods: In this quantitative, cross-sectional study, South African occupational therapists treating hand conditions were recruited. Data were collected via an emailed survey developed for the study. Data were analysed descriptively. Results: Sixty-seven responses met the inclusion criteria, a response rate of 62%. Most respondents worked in the private sector (73%) with many holding postgraduate qualifications (54%). Lack of access to evidence and a preference for biomedical literature impacted on acquiring knowledge on OBP. Attitudes towards OBP were mostly positive. Barriers were contextual, patient-related and therapist-related. Practice focussed predominantly on performance components and aimed to reduce impairment rather than promoting occupational engagement. Conclusion: Current hand therapy services in South Africa reflect a biomechanically-focused practice that is mis-aligned with occupational therapy philosophy. In line with existing research, OBP should be adopted more routinely in hand therapy in South Africa.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.