Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39246555›Full record

ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2024

Geographic Patterns of Ocular Oncologist Supply and Patient Demand for Uveal Melanoma Treatment in the United States: A Supply and Demand Analysis.

Alexander C Lieu, Benton G Chuter, Niloofar Radgoudarzi, Evan H Walker, John H Huang, Nathan L Scott, Natalie A Afshari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alexander C LieuSchool of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3141-3134
Benton G ChuterSchool of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Niloofar RadgoudarziSchool of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.ORCID 0009-0003-3413-8841
Evan H WalkerViterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology and Shiley Eye Institute, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA.
John H HuangViterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology and Shiley Eye Institute, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA.
Nathan L ScottViterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology and Shiley Eye Institute, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA.
Natalie A AfshariViterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology and Shiley Eye Institute, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To study geographic patterns of supply and demand for uveal melanoma and other ocular oncology healthcare by ocular oncology physicians in the United States. Methods: Google search interest data was obtained through trends.google.com. The combined-state density of ocular oncology physicians was calculated by dividing the number of practicing ocular oncologists in each state and its surrounding states by the state population. Relative search volume (RSV) values were divided by ocular oncology physician density to calculate the Google relative demand index (gRDI) for each state. Medicare (mRDI) and IRIS Results: Alabama showed the highest RSV (100), while the lowest was reported in New Mexico (20). Vermont had the highest density of combined-state ocular oncology ophthalmologists (1.85 per 100,000 residents). New Mexico had the lowest RDI (0.013 gRDI, 0.015 mRDI, 0.018 iRDI) with 32 combined-state ocular oncologists and a population of 2,114,371. Ocular neoplasm prevalence rates ranged between 1.32% and 5.40% and significantly correlated with RSV. Single-state gRDI correlated with rural status and negatively correlated with urban areas (≥50,000 individuals). Single-state ophthalmologist density correlated positively with percent living in urban areas and vision screening rates, and negatively with rural status. Conclusion: This study uncovered significant heterogeneity in the geographical distribution of ocular oncology physicians and RDI throughout the United States, highlighting potential undersupply scenarios. This may guide efforts to increase ocular oncology physician and surgeon availability in areas of need.

Indexed as

google trendsIRIS® Registrymedicareocular oncologyuveal melanoma

Identifiers

PMID39246555
PMCPMC11380477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.