ArticleACS omega2024
Effect of High-Voltage Electrostatic Precipitator Dust Collection Plate Structure on Collection Efficiency.
Article in ACS omega, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To investigate the effect of changes in the dust collector structure on the flow field and electric field distribution resulting from the secondary flow generated by the corona discharge in the collector coupled with the main flow and to improve the dust collection efficiency of the ESP, a folding plate design has been adopted. A multiphysics-coupled corona discharge and flow field numerical model was analyzed to analyze the internal flow and electric field characteristics of linear flat plates and folded plates with three different pole configurations. The study indicates that the dust collecting plate's structure significantly affects the dust collector's internal flow field and electric field distribution within the dust collector. The near-plate electric field and flow field inside the folded plate type are superior to those of the linear flat electrostatic precipitator. With the augmentation of the inlet velocity, the ionic wind disturbance on the flow field inside the electrostatic precipitator channel gradually decreases. Additionally, the folding plate has a certain inhibitory effect on the influence of the ionic wind. At an inlet velocity of 0.5 m/s, the speed near the folding plate is approximately 20% lower than that of the traditional linear flat plate. The folding plate can effectively reduce the flow velocity near the dust collection plate, thereby reducing the occurrence of particle re-entrainment and improving dust removal efficiency. By comparing the speed at the center line of the plate and near the plate, it is obvious that the speed of model B decreases significantly, and as the number of discharge electrodes increases, the speed decreases more obviously. At the same time, when the dust collection efficiency of the two models was compared, it was found that the working efficiency of the B model has been significantly improved, among which the B
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.