Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39246423›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of exercise science2024

Effects of Technique and Dummy Mass on Law Enforcement-Specific Body Drags: Testing and Training Implications.

Matthew R Moreno, J Jay Dawes, Robin M Orr, Joseph M Dulla, Robert G Lockie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of exercise science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Matthew R MorenoHuman Performance, Marine Corps Community Services, Camp Pendleton, CA, USA.
J Jay DawesSchool of Kinesiology, Applied Health and Recreation, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, USA.
Robin M OrrTactical Research Unit, Bond University, Robina, Qld, Australia.
Joseph M DullaTactical Research Unit, Bond University, Robina, Qld, Australia.
Robert G LockieCenter for Sport Performance, Department of Kinesiology, California State University, Fullerton, Fullerton, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current law enforcement body drag tests may use dummy masses that are underweight compared to current population norms. This study aimed to determine differences in 74.84-kg and 90.72-kg body drag times when performed with a standard (pick up and stand with dummy prior to dragging), adapted (incorporation of time to lift dummy to standing), and preferred (drag with any technique) technique. Forty-three (24 males, 19 females) physically-active, healthy civilians (surrogate population for police recruits) completed drags over 9.75 m with 74.84-kg and 90.72-kg dummies using the three techniques previously stated. A 2 (mass) × 3 (technique) within-factorial ANOVA (

Indexed as

Casualty dragoccupational testingpolicetacticalvictim drag

Identifiers

PMID39246423
PMCPMC11379063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.