Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39246414›Full record

ArticleClinical & translational immunology2024

Siglec-7 and Siglec-9 expression in primary triple negative and oestrogen receptor positive breast cancer and

Eline Jh van Houtum, Anne Hc Valk, Daniel Granado, Jasper Lok, Lune van den Bogaard, Naomi Remkes, Jesper van Eck van der Sluijs, Paul N Span, Lenneke Am Cornelissen, Gosse J Adema

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical & translational immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Sialic acidOncoimmunology · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Eline Jh van HoutumRadiotherapy & OncoImmunology Laboratory, Department of Radiation Oncology Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9037-4388
Anne Hc ValkRadiotherapy & OncoImmunology Laboratory, Department of Radiation Oncology Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6190-0438
Daniel GranadoRadiotherapy & OncoImmunology Laboratory, Department of Radiation Oncology Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen The Netherlands.
Jasper LokRadiotherapy & OncoImmunology Laboratory, Department of Radiation Oncology Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen The Netherlands.
Lune van den BogaardRadiotherapy & OncoImmunology Laboratory, Department of Radiation Oncology Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-9060-2925
Naomi RemkesRadiotherapy & OncoImmunology Laboratory, Department of Radiation Oncology Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen The Netherlands.
Jesper van Eck van der SluijsRadiotherapy & OncoImmunology Laboratory, Department of Radiation Oncology Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3136-7799
Paul N SpanRadiotherapy & OncoImmunology Laboratory, Department of Radiation Oncology Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1930-6638
Lenneke Am CornelissenRadiotherapy & OncoImmunology Laboratory, Department of Radiation Oncology Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2210-1606
Gosse J AdemaRadiotherapy & OncoImmunology Laboratory, Department of Radiation Oncology Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6750-1665

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint blockade can be an effective treatment for advanced breast cancer patients. However, patients with oestrogen receptor positive (ER+) tumors often display only low lymphocyte infiltration, while a large part of triple negative (TN) breast tumors does not generate an effective immunotherapy response. Therefore, new treatment strategies have to be developed. Here, we investigate Siglec-7 and Siglec-9 as novel ITIM-bearing inhibitory immune checkpoint receptors similar to PD-1, but expressed on a broader range of immune cells. Methods: We assessed Siglec-7 and Siglec-9 (ligand) expression in TN and ER+ breast cancer tumors and their breast cancer cell line-induced signalling. Results: We report that Siglec-7 and Siglec-9 are highly expressed in TN tumors, and to a low extent in ER+ tumors. Siglec-7 was observed on myeloid cells, T cells, and NK cells and Siglec-9 preferentially on myeloid cells. Expression of sialoglycans, including Siglec-7 and Siglec-9 ligands, was observed in both TN and ER+ breast cancer tissue sections. Expression levels of Siglec-7 and Siglec-9 ligands were higher on Conclusion: These data imply that immunotherapy targeting Siglec receptors may be particularly interesting for TN breast cancer patients not responding to current treatment strategies with tumors displaying high immune cell infiltration.

Indexed as

immune checkpoint receptorsimmunotherapyoestrogen receptor positive breast cancerSiglecstriple negative breast cancer

Identifiers

PMID39246414
PMCPMC11378723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.