Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39246212›Full record

SynthesisTrends in hearing

Adaptation to Reverberation for Speech Perception: A Systematic Review.

Avgeris Tsironis, Eleni Vlahou, Panagiota Kontou, Pantelis Bagos, Norbert Kopčo

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Trends in hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Neuronal Representation of Auditory Distance Percepts vs. Cues in Human Auditory Cortex.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Avgeris TsironisDepartment of Computer Science and Biomedical Informatics, University of Thessaly, Lamia, Greece.
Eleni VlahouDepartment of Computer Science and Biomedical Informatics, University of Thessaly, Lamia, Greece.ORCID 0000-0003-2497-577X
Panagiota KontouDepartment of Computer Science and Biomedical Informatics, University of Thessaly, Lamia, Greece.
Pantelis BagosDepartment of Computer Science and Biomedical Informatics, University of Thessaly, Lamia, Greece.
Norbert KopčoInstitute of Computer Science, Faculty of Science, Pavol Jozef Šafárik University, Košice, Slovakia.ORCID 0000-0001-5901-6355

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In everyday acoustic environments, reverberation alters the speech signal received at the ears. Normal-hearing listeners are robust to these distortions, quickly recalibrating to achieve accurate speech perception. Over the past two decades, multiple studies have investigated the various adaptation mechanisms that listeners use to mitigate the negative impacts of reverberation and improve speech intelligibility. Following the PRISMA guidelines, we performed a systematic review of these studies, with the aim to summarize existing research, identify open questions, and propose future directions. Two researchers independently assessed a total of 661 studies, ultimately including 23 in the review. Our results showed that adaptation to reverberant speech is robust across diverse environments, experimental setups, speech units, and tasks, in noise-masked or unmasked conditions. The time course of adaptation is rapid, sometimes occurring in less than 1 s, but this can vary depending on the reverberation and noise levels of the acoustic environment. Adaptation is stronger in moderately reverberant rooms and minimal in rooms with very intense reverberation. While the mechanisms underlying the recalibration are largely unknown, adaptation to the direct-to-reverberant ratio-related changes in amplitude modulation appears to be the predominant candidate. However, additional factors need to be explored to provide a unified theory for the effect and its applications.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalNoiseSpeech IntelligibilitySpeech PerceptionAcousticsAcoustic StimulationHumansPerceptual MaskingSpeech Acousticsauditory perceptual constancycalibrationroom acoustics

Identifiers

PMID39246212
PMCPMC11384524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.