Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39246077›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences2024

A theoretical perspective on solid-state ionic interfaces.

Javier Carrasco

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Javier CarrascoCentre for Cooperative Research on Alternative Energies (CIC energiGUNE), Basque Research and Technology Alliance (BRTA), Alava Technology Park, Albert Einstein 48 , Vitoria-Gasteiz 01510, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3117-6933

Funding

Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Solid-state ionic conductors find application across various domains in materials science, particularly showcasing their significance in energy storage and conversion technologies. To effectively utilize these materials in high-performance electrochemical devices, a comprehensive understanding and precise control of charge carriers' distribution and ionic mobility at interfaces are paramount. A major challenge lies in unravelling the atomic-level processes governing ion dynamics within intricate solid and interfacial structures, such as grain boundaries and heterophases. From a theoretical viewpoint, in this Perspective article, my focus is to offer an overview of the current comprehension of key aspects related to solid-state ionic interfaces, with a particular emphasis on solid electrolytes for batteries, while providing a personal critical assessment of recent research advancements. I begin by introducing fundamental concepts for understanding solid-state conductors, such as the classical diffusion model and chemical potential. Subsequently, I delve into the modelling of space-charge regions, which are pivotal for understanding the physicochemical origins of charge redistribution at electrified interfaces. Finally, I discuss modern computational methods, such as density functional theory and machine-learned potentials, which offer invaluable tools for gaining insights into the atomic-scale behaviour of solid-state ionic interfaces, including both ionic mobility and interfacial reactivity aspects. This article is part of the theme issue 'Celebrating the 15th anniversary of the Royal Society Newton International Fellowship'.

Indexed as

ab initio modellinginterfacial dynamicsionic conductorsionic transport mechanismsmachine learning in materials sciencesolid electrolytes

Identifiers

PMID39246077
PMCPMC11606440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.