ArticleClinical transplantation and research2024
Assessment of fluid responsiveness after tidal volume challenge in renal transplant recipients: a nonrandomized prospective interventional study.
Article in Clinical transplantation and research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Perioperative fluid management in kidney transplantation: What's new and future directives?World journal of nephrology · 2026Review
- The predictive value of tidal volume challenge-induced hemodynamic changes for fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing thoracoscopic surgery with one-lung ventilation: a prospective observational study.BMC anesthesiology · 2026Observational
- Perioperative considerations in kidney transplantation: An anaesthesiologist's perspective.World journal of transplantation · 2025Review
- Foundations and Advancements in Hemodynamic Monitoring: Part II - Advanced Parameters and Tools.Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation · 2025Article
- Tidal Volume Challenge to Assess Volume Responsiveness with Dynamic Preload Indices During Non-Cardiac Surgery: A Prospective Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: When applying lung-protective ventilation, fluid responsiveness cannot be predicted by pulse pressure variation (PPV) or stroke volume variation (SVV). Functional hemodynamic testing may help address this limitation. This study examined whether changes in dynamic indices such as PPV and SVV, induced by tidal volume challenge (TVC), can reliably predict fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing renal transplantation who receive lung-protective ventilation. Methods: This nonrandomized interventional study included renal transplant recipients with end-stage renal disease. Patients received ventilation with a 6 mL/kg tidal volume (TV), and the FloTrac system was attached for continuous hemodynamic monitoring. Participants were classified as responders or nonresponders based on whether fluid challenge increased the stroke volume index by more than 10%. Results: The analysis included 36 patients, of whom 19 (52.8%) were responders and 17 (47.2%) were nonresponders. Among responders, the mean ΔPPV Conclusions: TVC-induced changes in PPV and SVV are predictive of fluid responsiveness in renal transplant recipients who receive intraoperative lung-protective ventilation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.