ArticlePhysiological reports2024
Influence of foot strike pattern on co-contraction around the ankle and oxygen uptake during running at 19 km/h.
Article in Physiological reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Influence of foot strike pattern on co-contraction around the ankle and oxygen uptake during running at 19 km/h.Physiological reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study investigated the coactivation of plantar flexor and dorsiflexor muscles and oxygen uptake during running with forefoot and rearfoot strikes at 15 and 19 km/h. We included 16 male runners in this study. The participants ran each foot strike pattern for 5 min at 15 and 19 km/h on a treadmill. During the running, respiratory gas exchange data and surface electromyographic (EMG) activity of the medial gastrocnemius (MG), lateral gastrocnemius (LG), soleus, and tibialis anterior muscles of the right lower limb were continuously recorded. The indices of oxygen uptake, energy expenditure (EE), and muscle activation were calculated during the last 2 min in each condition. During the stance phase of running at 15 and 19 km/h, activation of the tibialis anterior and MG muscles was lower and higher, respectively, with forefoot strike than with rearfoot strike. The foot strike pattern did not influence the oxygen uptake. These results suggest that the foot strike pattern has no clear effect on the oxygen uptake when running at 15 and 19 km/h. However, forefoot strike leads to plantar flexion dominance during co-contraction of the tibialis anterior and MG muscles, which are an antagonist and agonist for plantar flexion, respectively, during the stance phase.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.