ArticleJournal of cellular and molecular medicine2024
Leveraging diverse cellular stress patterns for predicting clinical outcomes and therapeutic responses in patients with multiple myeloma.
Article in Journal of cellular and molecular medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Coumarin- and Dipicolylamine-Terpenoid Hybrids as Selective Carbonic Anhydrases IX and XII Inhibitors: Mechanistic Insights and Selective Anti-Cancer Potential.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Leveraging diverse cellular stress patterns for predicting clinical outcomes and therapeutic responses in patients with multiple myeloma.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Tumour microenvironment harbours diverse stress factors that affect the progression of multiple myeloma (MM), and the survival of MM cells heavily relies on crucial stress pathways. However, the impact of cellular stress on clinical prognosis of MM patients remains largely unknown. This study aimed to provide a cell stress-related model for survival and treatment prediction in MM. We incorporated five cell stress patterns including heat, oxidative, hypoxic, genotoxic, and endoplasmic reticulum stresses, to develop a comprehensive cellular stress index (CSI). Then we systematically analysed the effects of CSI on survival outcomes, clinical characteristics, immune microenvironment, and treatment sensitivity in MM. Molecular subtypes were identified using consensus clustering analysis based on CSI gene profiles. Moreover, a prognostic nomogram incorporating CSI was constructed and validated to aid in personalised risk stratification. After screening from five stress models, a CSI signature containing nine genes was established by Cox regression analyses and validated in three independent datasets. High CSI was significantly correlated with cell division pathways and poor clinical prognosis. Two distinct MM subtypes were identified through unsupervised clustering, showing significant differences in prognostic outcomes. The nomogram that combined CSI with clinical features exhibited good predictive performances in both training and validation cohorts. Meanwhile, CSI was closely associated with immune cell infiltration level and immune checkpoint gene expression. Therapeutically, patients with high CSI were more sensitive to bortezomib and antimitotic agents, while their response to immunotherapy was less favourable. Furthermore, in vitro experiments using cell lines and clinical samples verified the expression and function of key genes from CSI. The CSI signature could be a clinically applicable indicator of disease evaluation, demonstrating potential in predicting prognosis and guiding therapy for patients with MM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.