Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39245334›Full record

Trial reportThe American journal of cardiology2024

Association Between Lipoprotein(a) and Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease and High-Risk Plaque: Insights From the PROMISE Trial.

Thomas O'Toole, Nishant P Shah, Stephanie Nicole Giamberardino, Lydia Coulter Kwee, Deepak Voora, Robert W McGarrah, Maros Ferencik, Michael T Lu, William E Kraus, Borek Foldyna and 3 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The American journal of cardiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Thomas O'TooleDuke Clinical Research Institute; Department of Medicine.
Nishant P ShahDuke Clinical Research Institute; Department of Medicine.
Stephanie Nicole GiamberardinoDuke Molecular Physiology Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Lydia Coulter KweeDuke Molecular Physiology Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Deepak VooraDepartment of Medicine.
Robert W McGarrahDepartment of Medicine; Duke Molecular Physiology Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Maros FerencikKnight Cardiovascular Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Michael T LuCardiovascular Imaging Research Center, Dept. of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital - Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
William E KrausDepartment of Medicine; Duke Molecular Physiology Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Borek FoldynaCardiovascular Imaging Research Center, Dept. of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital - Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Pamela S DouglasDuke Clinical Research Institute; Department of Medicine.
Svati H ShahDuke Clinical Research Institute; Duke Molecular Physiology Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Neha J PagidipatiDuke Clinical Research Institute; Department of Medicine. Electronic address: neha.pagidipati@duke.edu.

Funding

ROLE OF DIETARY CONSTITUENTS ON GENE EXPRESSION IN INTESTINAL EPITHELIUMP30DK040561 · NIDDK · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI Elizabeth Austen Lawson, Takara Leah Stanley · 1994 to 2026
$31.6M
PROMISE Trial: Clinical Coordinating CenterR01HL098237 · NHLBI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI DOUGLAS, PAMELA SUSAN · 2009 to 2014
$27.3M
PROMISE Trial: SDCCR01HL098236 · NHLBI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI LEE, KERRY L · 2009 to 2014
$5.0M
PROMISE Trial: Dx CoreR01HL098305 · NHLBI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI HOFFMANN, UDO · 2009 to 2014
$3.5M
Mechanisms Connecting Dysregulated Branched-Chain Alpha-Ketoacid Metabolism to Cardiac DysfunctionR01HL160689 · NHLBI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Robert Walker McGarrah · 2022 to 2026
$2.6M
Pericoronary adipose tissue density a novel CT-derived marker of local inflammation and coronary artery disease in people living with HIVR01HL170877 · NHLBI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI Borek Foldyna · 2023 to 2026
$1.7M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL098236NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL098237NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL098305NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL160689NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL170877NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK040561
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The role of lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]) in the development of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) and high-risk plaque (HRP) in primary prevention patients with stable chest pain is unknown. We sought to evaluate the relation of Lp(a), independent of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), with the presence of obstructive CAD and HRP to improve understanding of the residual risk imparted by Lp(a) on CAD. We performed a secondary analysis in Prospective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain (PROMISE) Trial participants who had coronary computed tomographic angiography (CTA) performed and Lp(a) data available. Lp(a) concentration was analyzed as a binary variable, with elevated Lp(a) defined as ≥50 mg/100 ml. "Stenosis ≥50%" was defined as ≥50% coronary artery stenosis in any epicardial vessel, and "stenosis ≥70%" was defined as ≥70% coronary artery stenosis in any epicardial vessel and/or ≥50% left main coronary artery stenosis. HRP was defined as presence of plaque on CTA imaging with evidence of positive remodeling, low computed tomography attenuation, or napkin-ring sign. Multivariate logistic regression models were constructed to evaluate the association between Lp(a) and the outcomes of obstructive CAD and HRP stratified by LDL-C ≥100 versus <100 mg/100 ml. Of the 1,815 patients who underwent CTA and had Lp(a) data available, those with elevated Lp(a) were more commonly women and Black than those with lower Lp(a). Elevated Lp(a) was associated with stenosis ≥50% (odds ratio 1.57, 95% confidence interval 1.14 to 2.15, p = 0.005) and stenosis ≥70% (odds ratio 2.05, 95% confidence interval 1.34 to 3.11, p = 0.0008) in the multivariate models, and this relation was not modified by LDL-C ≥100 versus <100 mg/100 ml (interaction p >0.4). Elevated Lp(a) was not associated with HRP when adjusted for obstructive CAD. This study of patients without known CAD found that elevated Lp(a) ≥50 mg/100 ml was independently associated with the presence of obstructive CAD regardless of controlled versus uncontrolled LDL-C but was not independently associated with HRP when stenosis ≥50% or ≥70% was accounted for. Further research is warranted to delineate the role of Lp(a) in the residual risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease that patients may have despite optimal LDL-C lowering.

Indexed as

Computed Tomography AngiographyCoronary AngiographyCoronary Artery DiseaseLipoprotein(a)Plaque, AtheroscleroticAgedBiomarkersCholesterol, LDLCoronary StenosisFemaleHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsMaleMiddle AgedPrimary PreventionProspective StudiesBiomarkersCholesterol, LDLHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsLipoprotein(a)Rosuvastatin Calciumatherosclerotic cardiovascular diseasehigh-risk coronary plaquelipidslipoprotein (a)

Identifiers

PMID39245334
PMCPMC11524762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.