Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39245330›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroscience methods2024

Validating a novel paradigm for simultaneously assessing mismatch response and frequency-following response to speech sounds.

Tzu-Han Zoe Cheng, Tian Christina Zhao

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroscience methods, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tzu-Han Zoe ChengDepartment of Speech and Hearing Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA; Institute for Learning & Brain Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA. Electronic address: tzcheng@uw.edu.
Tian Christina ZhaoDepartment of Speech and Hearing Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA; Institute for Learning & Brain Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA. Electronic address: zhaotc@uw.edu.

Funding

Transform Dissemination and Implementation Science in CTSA ProgramsUL1TR002319 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI John K. Amory · 2017 to 2026
$100.0M
Neural mechanisms underlying the sensitive period for phonetic learning in infants at-risk for Developmental Language DisorderR01DC020419 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Tian Christina Zhao · 2022 to 2026
$2.5M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002319NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC020419
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSpeech sounds are processed in the human brain through intricate and interconnected cortical and subcortical structures. Two neural signatures, one largely from cortical sources (mismatch response, MMR) and one largely from subcortical sources (frequency-following response, FFR) are critical for assessing speech processing as they both show sensitivity to high-level linguistic information. However, there are distinct prerequisites for recording MMR and FFR, making them difficult to acquire simultaneously NEW

methodUsing a new paradigm, our study aims to concurrently capture both signals and test them against the following criteria: (1) replicating the effect that the MMR to a native speech contrast significantly differs from the MMR to a nonnative speech contrast, and (2) demonstrating that FFRs to three speech sounds can be reliably differentiated.

resultsUsing EEG from 18 adults, we observed a decoding accuracy of 72.2 % between the MMR to native vs. nonnative speech contrasts. A significantly larger native MMR was shown in the expected time window. Similarly, a significant decoding accuracy of 79.6 % was found for FFR. A high stimulus-to-response cross-correlation with a 9 ms lag suggested that FFR closely tracks speech sounds. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHOD(S): These findings demonstrate that our paradigm reliably captures both MMR and FFR concurrently, replicating and extending past research with much fewer trials (MMR: 50 trials; FFR: 200 trials) and shorter experiment time (12 minutes).

conclusionsThis study paves the way to understanding cortical-subcortical interactions for speech and language processing, with the ultimate goal of developing an assessment tool specific to early development.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationElectroencephalographySpeech PerceptionAdultBrainEvoked Potentials, AuditoryFemaleHumansMalePhoneticsYoung AdultFrequency-following responseMismatch responseRecording paradigmSpeech perception

Identifiers

PMID39245330
PMCPMC11688150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.