Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39244736›Full record

Trial reportOrthodontics & craniofacial research2025

Three-dimensional assessment on digital cast of spontaneous upper first molar distorotation after Ni-ti leaf springs expander and rapid maxillary expander: A two-centre randomized controlled trial.

Andrea Abate, Alessandro Ugolini, Alessandro Bruni, Vincenzo Quinzi, Valentina Lanteri

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Orthodontics & craniofacial research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05135962 (Leaf Expander Versus Hyrax Expander. A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05135962 naunknown statusnot on this map

Leaf Expander Versus Hyrax Expander. A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of GenovaRan2021 to 2023Enrolled200ConditionsMaxillary DeficiencyArmsorthodontic - rapid maxillary expansion, orthodontic - slow maxillary expansion with leaf expander, orthodontic - slow maxillary expansion with self leaf expander
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Andrea AbateDepartment of Sciences Integrated Surgical and Diagnostic, University of Genova, Genoa, Italy.
Alessandro UgoliniDepartment of Sciences Integrated Surgical and Diagnostic, University of Genova, Genoa, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2062-6014
Alessandro BruniSurgical, Medical and Dental Department, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6476-1357
Vincenzo QuinziDepartment of Life, Health & Environmental Sciences, Postgraduate School of Orthodontics, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3184-6899
Valentina LanteriSurgical, Medical and Dental Department, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2191-8673

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this randomized controlled trial (RCT) was to evaluate the spontaneous distorotation of upper first permanent molars and the transverse dentoalveolar changes on digital casts in growing patients following maxillary expansion treatment using either the Leaf Expander® or the rapid maxillary expander (RME), both anchored to the deciduous second molar. TRIAL DESIGN AND

settingThis study was a two-arm, parallel-assignment, RCT with a dual-centre design conducted at two teaching hospitals in Italy.

participantsInclusion criteria included maxillary transverse deficiency, prepubertal development stage (cervical vertebra maturation stage [CVMS] 1-2) and early mixed dentition with fully erupted upper first permanent molars. Exclusion criteria were systemic diseases or syndromes, CVMS 3-6, agenesis of upper second premolars, unavailability of the second deciduous molar for anchorage and Class III malocclusion. RANDOMIZATION: Patients were randomly assigned to the Leaf Expander® or RME group using a computer-generated randomization list created by a central randomization centre. Randomization was conducted immediately before the start of treatment.

interventionThe intervention involved treatment with either the Leaf Expander® or the RME. Both devices were anchored to the second deciduous molars. Following randomization, patients were further categorized based on the presence of no crossbite, unilateral crossbite or bilateral crossbite.

main outcome measureThe primary outcome measure was the distorotation of the upper first molar (U6). Secondary outcomes included measurements of interdental linear dimensions, specifically upper inter-canine width (53-63), upper inter-molar width (MV16-MV26) and upper inter-deciduous second molar width (55-65). BLINDING: The examiner analysing the digital casts was blinded to the treatment groups to prevent detection bias and ensure objective assessment. However, due to the nature of the intervention, blinding was not feasible for the patients and clinicians involved in administering the treatment.

resultsA total of 150 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to two groups: 75 to the Leaf Expander® group and 75 to the RME group. Recruitment started in November 2021 and was completed in November 2022. At the time of analysis, the trial was complete with no ongoing follow-ups. ANOVA tests revealed no significant differences between the three subgroups (no-cross, unilateral-cross and bilateral-cross) within both the Leaf Expander® and RME groups at T0. The Leaf Expander® demonstrated significantly greater distorotation in the unilateral crossbite subgroup compared to the RME (p = .014). In terms of total molar distorotation, the Leaf Expander® appliance showed a significantly greater effect (12.66°) compared with conventional RME (7.83°). Linear regression analysis demonstrated a significant correlation between the extent of expansion and the degree of molar rotation.

conclusionsMaxillary expansion resulted in significant spontaneous molar distorotation when the appliance was bonded to the second deciduous molars. The Leaf Expander® exhibited significantly greater molar distorotation compared with conventional RME. The degree of molar distorotation was correlated with the extent of expansion obtained on the second deciduous molar.

trial registrationThe trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (ID: NCT05135962).

Indexed as

MaxillaMolarPalatal Expansion TechniqueChildDentition, MixedFemaleHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalMaleMalocclusion, Angle Class IIIModels, DentalOrthodontic Appliance Designleaf expandermaxillary expansionmolar rotationrapid maxillary expansiontransverse maxillary deficiency

Identifiers

PMID39244736
PMCPMC11701968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.