ArticleCommunications biology2024
Comparative genomics reveal a novel phylotaxonomic order in the genus Fusobacterium.
Article in Communications biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Divergence of DioeciousMicroorganisms · 2026Article
- Deciphering potential significances of biliary microbiome in cholelithiasis and cholangiocarcinoma.Antonie van Leeuwenhoek · 2026Article
- Integrating ANI and phylogenies for re-evaluation of Fusobacterium taxonomy and disease associations.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Genetic predictive links between oropharyngeal microecology and obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: expanding the perspective of etiology.Journal of oral microbiology · 2026Review
- A data-driven universal gut microbiome health assessment: a machine learning framework trained on large metagenomic data.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Taxonomy, carcinogenic mechanisms, and advanced molecular diagnosis of Fusobacterium nucleatum in colorectal cancer: from bench to clinical practice.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Reassessing taxonomy and virulence in themBio · 2025Article
- Positive selection at core genes may underlie niche adaptation in Fusobacterium animalis.Gut pathogens · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Fusobacteria have been associated to different diseases, including colorectal cancer (CRC), but knowledge of which taxonomic groups contribute to specific conditions is incomplete. We analyzed the genetic diversity and relationships within the Fusobacterium genus. We report recent and ancestral recombination in core genes, indicating that fusobacteria have mosaic genomes and emphasizing that taxonomic demarcation should not rely on single genes/gene regions. Across databases, we found ample evidence of species miss-classification and of undescribed species, which are both expected to complicate disease association. By focusing on a lineage that includes F. periodonticum/pseudoperiodonticum and F. nucleatum, we show that genomes belong to four modern populations, but most known species/subspecies emerged from individual ancestral populations. Of these, the F. periodonticum/pseudoperiodonticum population experienced the lowest drift and displays the highest genetic diversity, in line with the less specialized distribution of these bacteria in oral sites. A highly drifted ancestral population instead contributed genetic ancestry to a new species, which includes genomes classified within the F. nucleatum animalis diversity in a recent CRC study. Thus, evidence herein calls for a re-analysis of F. nucleatum animalis features associated to CRC. More generally, our data inform future molecular profiling approaches to investigate the epidemiology of Fusobacterium-associated diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.