ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2024
The impact of blastocyst grade on singleton birth weight in fresh IVF‒ET cycles in ART: a retrospective study.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Factors influencing the birth weight of ART-conceived offspring.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2025Review
- Age-related decline in behavior and reproductive health in male mice.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Morphometric Blastocyst Assessment: A Retrospective Study Examining the Relationship Between Blastocyst Diameter and Area and Pregnancy Outcomes in Assisted Reproduction Technology Cycles.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe positive correlation between embryo quality and pregnancy outcomes has been confirmed in many studies, but there are few on the impact of embryo quality on neonatal weight, especially among neonates from fresh IVF‒ET cycles in ART. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the birth weights of infants from different blastocyst grades in fresh IVF-ET cycles and explore related factors affecting birth weight.
methodsThe main outcome measure was singleton birth weight. A total of 1301 fresh cycles of single blastocyst transplantation and single live birth profiles were retrospectively analyzed and divided into four groups according to blastocyst quality: the excellent group (grade AA), which included 170 cycles; the good group (grade AB/BA), which included 312 cycles; the average group (grade BB/CA/AC), which included 559 cycles; and the poor group (grade BC/CB), which included 260 cycles. The relationships among cystic cavity expansion, endocytic cell mass, ectodermal trophoblast cell grade, and birth weight were studied. Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to investigate the relationship between blastocyst quality and neonatal birth weight and logistic regression for the risk factors for low birth weight newborns.
resultsWith decreases in the blastocyst quality, including ICM, TE quality, and embryo expansion stage, birth weight declined, and Z scores correspondingly decreased. After adjusting for confounders, the average and poor groups (P = 0.01 and P = 0.001, respectively) and blastocysts with TE grade C (P = 0.022) resulted in singletons with lower birth weight. Additionally, the poor group and blastocysts with Grade C TEs had a greater chance of leading to low birth weight infants compared with the other groups.
conclusionOur findings indicated that excellent and good-grade blastocyst transplantation could achieve better pregnancy outcomes and that average and poor-grade blastocyst transplantation, especially with grade C TEs, were associated with single birth weight loss. No association was found between the embryo expansion stage or ICM quality and neonatal birth weight.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.