SynthesisJournal of advanced research2025
Metabolic phenotyping combined with transcriptomics metadata fortifies the diagnosis of early-stage Hepatocellular carcinoma.
Synthesis in Journal of advanced research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Global Advances in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Research and Therapy in 2025.Cancer innovation · 2026Review
- Systematic review of metabolomic profiles linked to liver cancer.Journal of liver cancer · 2026Article
- MRI Radiomics for Distinguishing HBV-Related Early Hepatocellular Carcinoma from Precancerous Nodules.Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma · 2026Article
- Multi-Omics Biomarker Signatures for Precision Diagnosis and Prognosis in Primary Liver Cancer: A Literature Review.BioFactors (Oxford, England)Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe low sensitivity of alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) renders it unsuitable as a stand-alone marker for early hepatocellular carcinoma (eHCC) surveillance. Therefore, additional blood-based biomarkers with enhanced sensitivities are required.
objectivesIn light of the metabolic changes that are distinctive to eHCC development, the current study presents a panel of serum metabolites that may serve as noninvasive diagnostic indicators for patients with eHCC.
methodsSerum samples obtained from normal control (NC), cirrhosis, and eHCC patients were analyzed by four different metabolomic platforms. A meta-analysis of very early-stage HCC transcriptomic datasets retrieved from public sources supports the integrated interpretation with metabolic changes.
resultsA total of 94 metabolites were significantly correlated with a progressive disease status. Integrated analysis of the significant metabolites and differentially expressed genes from meta-analysis emphasized metabolic pathways including bile acid biosynthesis, phenylalanine and tyrosine metabolism, and butanoate metabolism. The 11 metabolites associated with these pathways were compiled into a metabolite panel for use as diagnostic signatures. With an accuracy of 81.8%, compared with 45.4% for a model trained solely on AFP, the model enhanced its ability to differentiate between the three groups by incorporating a metabolite panel and AFP. Upon examining the trained models using receiver operating characteristic curves, the AFP and metabolite panel combined model exhibited greater area under the curve values in comparisons between NC and eHCC (1.000 versus 0.810) and cirrhosis and eHCC (0.926 versus 0.556). The result was consistent in an independent validation cohort.
conclusionThis study emphasizes the role of circulating metabolite markers in the diagnosis of eHCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.