Trial reportThe American journal of cardiology2024
Prevention of Heart Failure in Hypertension-the Role of Coronary Heart Disease Events Treated With Versus Without Revascularization: The ALLHAT Study.
Trial report in The American journal of cardiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In modern clinical practice, less than half of patients with new-onset heart failure (HF) undergo ischemic evaluation and only a minority undergo revascularization. We aimed to assess the proportion of the effect of hypertension (antihypertensive treatment) on incident HF to be eliminated by prevention of coronary heart disease (CHD) event treated with or without revascularization, considering possible treatment-mediator interaction. The causal mediation analysis of Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT) included 42,418 participants (age 66.9 ± 7.7, 35.6% black, 53.2% men). A new CHD event (myocardial infarction or angina) that occurred after randomization but before the incident HF outcome was the mediator. Incident symptomatic congestive HF (CHF) and hospitalized/fatal HF (HHF) were the primary and secondary outcomes, respectively. Logistic regression (for mediator) and Cox proportional hazards regression (for outcome) were adjusted for demographics, cardiovascular disease history, and risk factors. During a median 4.5-year follow-up, 2,785 patients developed CHF, including 2,216 HHF events. Participants who developed CHD events had twice the higher incidence rate of CHF than CHD-free (28.5 vs 13.9 events/1,000 person-years). The proportion of reference interaction indicating direct harm because of a CHD event for lisinopril (234% for CHF, 355% for HHF) and amlodipine (244% for CHF, 468% for HHF) was greater than for chlortalidone (143% for CHF, 269% for HHF). In patients with revascularized CHD events, chlortalidone and amlodipine eliminated 21% to 24% and lisinopril eliminated -45% of HHF. Antihypertensive treatment could not eliminate harm from CHD events treated without revascularization. In conclusion, the antihypertensive drugs (chlortalidone, lisinopril, and amlodipine) prevent HF not principally by preventing CHD events but by way of other pathways. HF is moderated but not mediated by CHD events. Revascularization of CHD events is paramount for HF prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.