ArticleMedical image analysis2025
Learning lifespan brain anatomical correspondence via cortical developmental continuity transfer.
Article in Medical image analysis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biophysical modeling of anatomically realistic prenatal cortical folding development.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Biophysical modeling of anatomically realistic prenatal cortical folding development.Research square · 2026Article
- USING STRUCTURAL SIMILARITY AND KOLMOGOROV-ARNOLD NETWORKS FOR ANATOMICAL EMBEDDING OF CORTICAL FOLDING PATTERNS.Proceedings. IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging · 2025Article
- Disparities in accelerated brain aging in recent-onset and chronic schizophrenia.Psychological medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Identifying anatomical correspondences in the human brain throughout the lifespan is an essential prerequisite for studying brain development and aging. But given the tremendous individual variability in cortical folding patterns, the heterogeneity of different neurodevelopmental stages, and the scarce of neuroimaging data, it is difficult to infer reliable lifespan anatomical correspondence at finer scales. To solve this problem, in this work, we take the advantage of the developmental continuity of the cerebral cortex and propose a novel transfer learning strategy: the model is trained from scratch using the age group with the largest sample size, and then is transferred and adapted to the other groups following the cortical developmental trajectory. A novel loss function is designed to ensure that during the transfer process the common patterns will be extracted and preserved, while the group-specific new patterns will be captured. The proposed framework was evaluated using multiple datasets covering four lifespan age groups with 1,000+ brains (from 34 gestational weeks to young adult). Our experimental results show that: 1) the proposed transfer strategy can dramatically improve the model performance on populations (e.g., early neurodevelopment) with very limited number of training samples; and 2) with the transfer learning we are able to robustly infer the complicated many-to-many anatomical correspondences among different brains at different neurodevelopmental stages. (Code will be released soon: https://github.com/qidianzl/CDC-transfer).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.