Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39243282›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2024

Survey of international pediatric nutritional supportive care practices: a report from the Pediatric Study Group of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC).

Charles A Phillips, Regina Kennelly, Catherine Carroll, Faith Gibson, Caitlin W Elgarten, Andrea Orsey, Jason L Freedman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Nutrition and physical activity interventions delivered to children and young people during cancer treatment: a systematic literature review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Charles A PhillipsDivision of Oncology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 3500 Civic Center Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Regina KennellyPediatrics Residency Program, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Catherine CarrollNational Children's Cancer Service, Children's Health Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Faith GibsonSchool of Health Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.
Caitlin W ElgartenDivision of Oncology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 3500 Civic Center Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Andrea OrseyCenter for Cancer and Blood Disorders, Connecticut Children's Medical Center, Hartford, CT, USA.
Jason L FreedmanDivision of Oncology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 3500 Civic Center Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA. freedmanj@chop.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMalnutrition is common in children with cancer. While multiple validated malnutrition screens exist, there is no universal, standardized approach to screen or diagnose malnutrition. The Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) Pediatric Study Group is focused on oncologic supportive care for children and young adults. This subgroup designed and administered a pilot study to characterize global malnutrition screening, diagnosis, and treatment practices for pediatric patients with cancer after identifying variations in malnutrition practice patterns within its members.

methodsA novel, exploratory survey was iteratively developed and distributed in early 2020 to 45 MASCC Pediatric Study Group members. The survey included multiple questions with standard patient presentations and nutritional scenarios, and the respondents selected the answer that best reflected the care patients would receive at their institution.

resultsA validated screening tool to assess for malnutrition was routinely used by 15 of 26 respondents (58%). No single validated screen was used by more than 24% of responders, and 11 of 26 (42%) reported not having a standard malnutrition treatment screen. When the same patient was presented with the survey using different malnutrition indicators, patient care plans varied greatly. This was particularly true for z-scores compared to weight percentiles.

conclusionsDevelopment of consensus recommendations for screening practices, preferred malnutrition indicators, and treatment guidelines could help reduce the underdiagnosis of malnutrition and subsequent variation in its management and ought to be a focus of the global pediatric cancer supportive care community.

Indexed as

MalnutritionNeoplasmsNutritional SupportAdolescentChildFemaleHumansMaleNutrition AssessmentPilot ProjectsPractice Patterns, Physicians'Surveys and QuestionnairesMalnutritionPediatric oncologyUndernutrition; Clinical nutrition; malnutrition; Pediatric oncology

Identifiers

PMID39243282
PMCPMC11380636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.