ArticleBioData mining2024
Enhanced labor pain monitoring using machine learning and ECG waveform analysis for uterine contraction-induced pain.
Article in BioData mining, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04461704 (To Study the Association Among Labor Pain and Physical Parameters in Laboring Pregnant Women), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
To Study the Association Among Labor Pain and Physical Parameters in Laboring Pregnant Women
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence and predictive analytics in obstetric anesthesia: early warning for maternal complications.Current opinion in anaesthesiology · 2026Review
- A peak-oriented diffusion model for high-fidelity electrocardiogram reconstruction from photoplethysmogram: development and usability study.BioData mining · 2026Article
- AI in Childbirth and Emerging Alternatives to Traditional Fertility Treatments.Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2026Review
- Pain assessment using physiological responses/markers in different types of pain: a scoping review.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Comprehensive Review on Personalized Pain Assessment and Multimodal Interventions for Postoperative Recovery Optimization.Journal of pain research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study aims to develop an innovative approach for monitoring and assessing labor pain through ECG waveform analysis, utilizing machine learning techniques to monitor pain resulting from uterine contractions.
methodsThe study was conducted at National Taiwan University Hospital between January and July 2020. We collected a dataset of 6010 ECG samples from women preparing for natural spontaneous delivery (NSD). The ECG data was used to develop an ECG waveform-based Nociception Monitoring Index (NoM). The dataset was divided into training (80%) and validation (20%) sets. Multiple machine learning models, including LightGBM, XGBoost, SnapLogisticRegression, and SnapDecisionTree, were developed and evaluated. Hyperparameter optimization was performed using grid search and five-fold cross-validation to enhance model performance.
resultsThe LightGBM model demonstrated superior performance with an AUC of 0.96 and an accuracy of 90%, making it the optimal model for monitoring labor pain based on ECG data. Other models, such as XGBoost and SnapLogisticRegression, also showed strong performance, with AUC values ranging from 0.88 to 0.95.
conclusionsThis study demonstrates that the integration of machine learning algorithms with ECG data significantly enhances the accuracy and reliability of labor pain monitoring. Specifically, the LightGBM model exhibits exceptional precision and robustness in continuous pain monitoring during labor, with potential applicability extending to broader healthcare settings.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04461704.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.