Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39243100›Full record

ArticleBioData mining2024

Enhanced labor pain monitoring using machine learning and ECG waveform analysis for uterine contraction-induced pain.

Yuan-Chia Chu, Saint Shiou-Sheng Chen, Kuen-Bao Chen, Jui-Sheng Sun, Tzu-Kuei Shen, Li-Kuei Chen

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioData mining, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04461704 (To Study the Association Among Labor Pain and Physical Parameters in Laboring Pregnant Women), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04461704 completednot on this map

To Study the Association Among Labor Pain and Physical Parameters in Laboring Pregnant Women

TypeobservationalSponsorCJshine Technology Company Ltd.Ran2020 to 2020Enrolled16ConditionsLabor Pain
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. AI in Childbirth and Emerging Alternatives to Traditional Fertility Treatments.Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yuan-Chia Chu *Department of Information Management, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, 11267, Taiwan, R.O.C.
Saint Shiou-Sheng Chen *Division of Urology, Taipei City Hospital Renai Branch, Taipei, 106243, Taiwan, R.O.C.
Kuen-Bao ChenCollege of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, 40402, Taiwan, R.O.C.
Jui-Sheng SunDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, 10617, Taiwan, R.O.C.
Tzu-Kuei ShenVice President & CTO, R&D and Production Department, V5med Inc., Hsinchu, 30078, Taiwan, R.O.C.
Li-Kuei ChenCollege of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, 40402, Taiwan, R.O.C.. clk0619@ntu.edu.tw.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study aims to develop an innovative approach for monitoring and assessing labor pain through ECG waveform analysis, utilizing machine learning techniques to monitor pain resulting from uterine contractions.

methodsThe study was conducted at National Taiwan University Hospital between January and July 2020. We collected a dataset of 6010 ECG samples from women preparing for natural spontaneous delivery (NSD). The ECG data was used to develop an ECG waveform-based Nociception Monitoring Index (NoM). The dataset was divided into training (80%) and validation (20%) sets. Multiple machine learning models, including LightGBM, XGBoost, SnapLogisticRegression, and SnapDecisionTree, were developed and evaluated. Hyperparameter optimization was performed using grid search and five-fold cross-validation to enhance model performance.

resultsThe LightGBM model demonstrated superior performance with an AUC of 0.96 and an accuracy of 90%, making it the optimal model for monitoring labor pain based on ECG data. Other models, such as XGBoost and SnapLogisticRegression, also showed strong performance, with AUC values ranging from 0.88 to 0.95.

conclusionsThis study demonstrates that the integration of machine learning algorithms with ECG data significantly enhances the accuracy and reliability of labor pain monitoring. Specifically, the LightGBM model exhibits exceptional precision and robustness in continuous pain monitoring during labor, with potential applicability extending to broader healthcare settings.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04461704.

Indexed as

Artificial Intelligence (AI)Clinical Decision-MakingElectrocardiography (ECG)Healthcare TechnologyLabor PainMachine LearningNociception AssessmentPain MonitoringPredictive AnalyticsUterine Contractions

Identifiers

PMID39243100
PMCPMC11380346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.