Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39243083›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2024

Internal validation of modified Mirels' scoring system for pathologic femur fractures.

Vishal S Desai, Richard L Amendola, Kenneth A Mann, Timothy A Damron

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Fibrous dysplasia: clinical and pathologic characteristics, surgical approaches, and outcomes in a large Italian cohort.Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Pathological fractures in the paediatric orthopaedic patient population: a current concepts overview of assessment and management.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Vishal S DesaiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, SUNY Upstate Medical University, 750 East Adams Street, Syracuse, NY, 13210, USA.
Richard L AmendolaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, SUNY Upstate Medical University, 750 East Adams Street, Syracuse, NY, 13210, USA.
Kenneth A MannDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, SUNY Upstate Medical University, 750 East Adams Street, Syracuse, NY, 13210, USA. mannk@upstate.edu.
Timothy A DamronDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, SUNY Upstate Medical University, 750 East Adams Street, Syracuse, NY, 13210, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe proximal femur is a common site of bone metastasis. The Mirels' score is a frequently utilized system to identify patients at risk for pathologic fracture and while it has consistently demonstrated strong sensitivity, specificity has been relatively poor. Our group previously developed a Modified Mirels' scoring system which demonstrated improved ability to predict cases at risk of fracture in this patient population through modification of the Mirels' location score. The purpose of the present study is to internally validate this newly developed scoring system on an independent patient series.

methodsRetrospective review was performed to identify patients who were evaluated for proximal femoral bone lesions. Patients were stratified into one of two groups: 1) those who went on to fracture within 4 months after initial evaluation (Fracture Group) and 2) those who did not fracture within 4 months of initial evaluation (No Fracture Group). Retrospective chart review was performed to assign an Original Mirels' (OM) Score and Modified Mirels' (MM) score to each patient at the time of initial evaluation. Descriptive statistics, logistic regression, receiver operating curve, and net benefit analyses were performed to determine the predictability of fractures when utilizing both scoring systems.

resultsThe use of the MM scoring improved fracture prediction over OM scoring for patients observed over a 4 month follow up based on logistic regression. Decision curve analysis showed that there was a net benefit using the MM score over the OM scoring for a full range of fracture threshold probabilities. Fracture prevalence was similar for current internal validation dataset when compared to the dataset of our index study with a comparable reduction in misclassification of fracture prediction when utilizing the modified scoring system versus the original.

conclusionsUse of MM scoring was found to improve fracture prediction over OM scoring when tested on an internal validation set of patients with disseminated metastatic lesions to the proximal femur. The improvement in fracture prediction demonstrated in the present study mirrored the results of our index study during which the MM system was developed.

Indexed as

Femoral FracturesAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBone NeoplasmsFemaleFractures, SpontaneousHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentDecision curve analysisFinite elementMirels scoringPathologic fractureProximal femur

Identifiers

PMID39243083
PMCPMC11378396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.